TUnit-native math assertion library for .NET. Covers tolerance comparisons (scalar, System.Numerics compounds, spans, tensors), sequences, statistics, linear algebra, number theory, and 3D geometry. Source-generated entry points integrate with TUnit's Assert.That(...) pipeline. NaN-aware, infinity-aware, AOT-compatible, reflection-free in the assertion path.
Scope: Test projects only. Not intended for production code.
The framework-agnostic core is feature-complete across seven topical clusters and the TUnit adapter exposes a near-full fluent surface over Assert.That(value).Method(...); the documented exception is ReadOnlyTensorSpan<T>, which is exposed only at the static MathTolerance level (see the carve-out note below the table). v0.2.0 adds rich per-component / per-cell delta rendering to every compound IsApproximatelyEqualTo failure message and ships HasAxisAngleApproximately for axis-angle-form quaternion rotation checks. Every fluent entry point is generated via TUnit's [GenerateAssertion] source generator and integrates directly into the existing Assert.That(...) pipeline. v0.3.0 adds the MathAssertions.Render namespace with PoseRenderer, a pure renderer that turns a position / orientation pose into deterministic, snapshot-friendly text for pinning via SnapshotAssertions.TUnit. v0.4.0 adds IsPoseApproximatelyEqualTo (and the Matrix4x4 overload IsRigidTransformApproximatelyEqualTo), comparing a pose's position and orientation in one call with separate tolerances and a combined failure diagnostic. v0.5.0 makes the vector parallel check scale-invariant and adds HasAngleBetweenApproximately for vectors and IsRotation for matrices.
| Domain | Coverage |
|---|---|
| Tolerance primitives | Scalar / vector / quaternion / matrix / plane / complex / span / tensor IsApproximatelyEqual; ULP-distance equality; combined relative + absolute tolerance; finiteness, probability, percentage predicates; invertible-transformation roundtrip-identity |
System.Numerics compounds |
Vector2/Vector3/Vector4 component-wise; Quaternion component-wise plus rotational equivalence (SO(3) double-cover); Matrix4x4 element-wise; Plane component-wise plus geometric equivalence; Complex; ReadOnlySpan<double>/<float>; generic ReadOnlyTensorSpan<T> |
| Sequences | Monotonicity (strict and non-strict), sortedness, boundedness with NaN-aware element check, arithmetic / geometric progressions, single-step Cauchy convergence, generic length predicates |
| Statistics | Welford's mean + variance, median, percentile (overflow-safe), standard deviation, sum, sigma-bound checks |
| Linear algebra | Matrix4x4 invariants (symmetric, orthogonal, proper rotation, identity, determinant, trace, invertible); Vector3 pair properties (orthogonality, scale-invariant parallelism, angle between, linear independence) |
| Number theory | long predicates: divisibility, primality (overflow-safe), coprimality, GCD/LCM (long.MinValue-aware, OverflowException-on-LCM-overflow), powers of base, perfect square (overflow-safe successor check), modular congruence (canonical-residue form) |
| Geometry3D | Eight primitive record struct types (Sphere, AxisAlignedBox, OrientedBox, Ray3D, LineSegment3D, Triangle3D, Capsule, Cylinder); property predicates (IsDegenerate, IsCollinear, AreCoplanar); containment (point/box/sphere/OBB/convex hull); closest-point distance (point->plane/segment/triangle, citing Ericson, Real-Time Collision Detection §§5.1.2, 5.1.5); intersection (sphere-sphere, AABB-AABB, ray-plane/sphere/triangle/AABB, citing Akenine-Möller, Haines, Hoffman, Real-Time Rendering 4th ed. §§22.6, 22.7, 22.8); pointcloud aggregates (boundedness, centroid, on-plane, on-sphere) |
MathAssertions.TUnit ships ~85 fluent extensions across twelve adapter classes; MathAssertions (the framework-agnostic core) ships the underlying static helpers. See the per-package READMEs and CHANGELOG for the exhaustive method listings.
ReadOnlyTensorSpan<T> is exposed only at the static MathTolerance level, not as a fluent assertion: TUnit's [GenerateAssertion] assertion-builder cannot capture ref-struct values across an await. Tensor-fluent integration is candidate work for a later release.
- Why this package
- Install
- Package layout
- Namespaces (and a
GlobalUsings.csrecommendation) - Quick start
- Why component-wise rather than Euclidean distance
- Tolerance precision
- Entry points
- Failure diagnostics
- Cookbook: common patterns
- Design notes
- NaN and infinity semantics
- Stability intent (pre-1.0)
- Limitations and future work
- Family compatibility
- Pair with
- Contributing
- License
Asserting on tolerance-based equality of System.Numerics compound types (Vector2/3/4, Quaternion, Matrix4x4, Plane, Complex) typically devolves into one of:
- Manual per-component plumbing in every test:
await Assert.That(Math.Abs(actual.X - expected.X)).IsLessThanOrEqualTo(tolerance); await Assert.That(Math.Abs(actual.Y - expected.Y)).IsLessThanOrEqualTo(tolerance); await Assert.That(Math.Abs(actual.Z - expected.Z)).IsLessThanOrEqualTo(tolerance);
- A bespoke
Vector3Assertionsclass re-implemented in every project, with subtle differences in NaN-handling and infinity-handling between codebases.
This library replaces both with a single fluent DSL that auto-imports alongside TUnit's own assertions. NaN, infinity, and tolerance-validation semantics match TUnit's IsCloseTo primitive so the mental model stays consistent.
dotnet add package MathAssertions.TUnitRequirements: TUnit 1.55.2 or later, .NET 10. MathAssertions (the framework-agnostic core) and TUnit's runtime + assertion deps come transitively. The package is AOT-compatible, trimmable, and uses no runtime reflection in the assertion path.
This repo ships two NuGet packages:
| Package | Purpose | Depends on |
|---|---|---|
MathAssertions |
Framework-agnostic core: MathTolerance, Sequences, Statistics, LinearAlgebra, NumberTheory, and the Geometry3D namespace (~85 static methods plus eight primitive record struct types) |
BCL + System.Numerics.Tensors |
MathAssertions.TUnit |
TUnit-specific fluent entry points generated via [GenerateAssertion]: ~85 Assert.That(value).Method(...) extensions covering the whole core surface |
MathAssertions + TUnit.Assertions + TUnit.Core |
You install MathAssertions.TUnit; MathAssertions comes transitively. Adapters for other test frameworks (NUnit, xUnit, MSTest) are not shipped today; they would reuse the MathAssertions core. Open a feature request if you need one.
The two packages place types in two namespaces with deliberately-different scopes:
| Type / member | Namespace | Auto-imported? |
|---|---|---|
IsApproximatelyEqualTo() on Vector3 (source-generated entry) |
TUnit.Assertions.Extensions |
Yes (TUnit auto-imports) |
MathTolerance (the framework-agnostic helpers) |
MathAssertions |
No (needed at the call site only when invoking helpers directly, e.g. from a [GenerateAssertion] extension on a private type) |
The Vector3 fluent assertion auto-imports via TUnit.Assertions.Extensions; no extra using directive is needed if your test project already uses TUnit. For test projects that consume MathTolerance directly (as in the extending to your own types cookbook entry below), put the namespace into a single GlobalUsings.cs so every test file sees it without ceremony:
// tests/MyApp.Tests/GlobalUsings.cs
global using MathAssertions;using System.Numerics;
[Test]
public async Task ComputedPositionIsApproximatelyAtTarget(CancellationToken ct)
{
Vector3 target = new(0.300f, 0.150f, 0.450f);
Vector3 actual = SolveTrajectory(input);
await Assert.That(actual).IsApproximatelyEqualTo(target, tolerance: 1e-3);
}That's the canonical use. The fluent extension auto-imports; using System.Numerics; is the only additional thing you need beyond standard TUnit usings.
IsApproximatelyEqualTo(Vector3, Vector3, tolerance) compares each component independently:
Math.Abs((double)a.X - (double)b.X) <= tolerance
&& Math.Abs((double)a.Y - (double)b.Y) <= tolerance
&& Math.Abs((double)a.Z - (double)b.Z) <= tolerance
NOT Euclidean distance ((a - b).Length() <= tolerance). Reasons:
- Easier to reason about per-coordinate error. A test failing because Z drifted tells you exactly which coordinate misbehaved. A Euclidean-distance test failing tells you "something is off somewhere"; you have to instrument the assertion to find out which axis.
- No square-root cost. Pure component arithmetic, no
Math.Sqrt. Matters more for matrix-element loops at v0.1.0 (16 elements per Matrix4x4 comparison) than for one Vector3, but the rule applies uniformly. - Matches the most common test-failure mental model. "Is each component correct" maps onto how production code that produces these vectors typically computes them (per-axis from independent inputs).
If you want Euclidean-distance assertions, compose with TUnit's primitive IsCloseTo:
await Assert.That(Vector3.Distance(a, b)).IsCloseTo(0, tolerance);Component values widen to double before the per-axis comparison so the caller's double tolerance is honored at full precision. Casting the tolerance down to float instead would discard up to 22 bits of mantissa and silently round tight tolerances such as 1e-9 to zero, producing surprising "every-component-equal" results for inputs that visibly differ.
This precision-preserving cast is locked behavior. Tests pin it; v0.1.0 additive overloads (Vector2, Vector4, Quaternion, Matrix4x4, etc.) inherit it.
~85 fluent entry points across twelve adapter classes cover scalar, System.Numerics compounds, double[]/float[], sequences, statistics, linear algebra, integer number theory, and a complete 3D-geometry surface. v0.2.0 adds HasAxisAngleApproximately on Quaternion and per-component delta rendering in every compound failure message. The exhaustive method listing lives in the package README; the examples below are representative.
| Entry point | Behavior |
|---|---|
IsApproximatelyEqualTo(Vector3 expected, double tolerance) |
Asserts every component (X, Y, Z) of the value is within tolerance of the corresponding component of expected. Components widen to double for precision. NaN-aware, infinity-aware (see NaN and infinity semantics). |
var a = new Vector3(1, 2, 3);
var b = new Vector3(1.0001f, 2.0001f, 3.0001f);
await Assert.That(a).IsApproximatelyEqualTo(b, tolerance: 1e-3);var rotation = Quaternion.CreateFromAxisAngle(Vector3.UnitY, MathF.PI / 2);
var negated = new Quaternion(-rotation.X, -rotation.Y, -rotation.Z, -rotation.W);
// q and -q encode the same rotation; component-wise IsApproximatelyEqualTo would fail.
await Assert.That(rotation).IsRotationallyEquivalentTo(negated, tolerance: 1e-6);// "the rotation under test is approximately 90 degrees around the Y axis"
var rotation = Quaternion.CreateFromAxisAngle(Vector3.UnitY, MathF.PI / 2);
await Assert.That(rotation)
.HasAxisAngleApproximately(Vector3.UnitY, expectedAngleDegrees: 90.0, tolerance: 1e-4);HasAxisAngleApproximately handles the SO(3) double cover and the 180-degree boundary; both q and -q for the same rotation, as well as (axis, +180°) / (axis, -180°) / (-axis, ±180°), compare equivalent to the same expected axis-angle pair. Internally compares via the rotational-equivalence dot-product test, then renders the extracted axis / angle in the failure message for diagnosis.
A pose is a position and an orientation together. IsPoseApproximatelyEqualTo compares both halves in one call, with separate tolerances because they carry different units: position as a Euclidean distance, rotation as a geodesic angle in degrees.
(Vector3 position, Quaternion orientation) actual = ComputePose(input);
await Assert.That((actual.position, actual.orientation))
.IsPoseApproximatelyEqualTo((expectedPosition, expectedOrientation),
positionTolerance: 1e-3, rotationToleranceDegrees: 0.5);
// Matrix4x4 overload: a pose is a rigid transform.
await Assert.That(actualTransform)
.IsRigidTransformApproximatelyEqualTo(expectedTransform,
positionTolerance: 1e-3, rotationToleranceDegrees: 0.5);The orientation comparison uses the SO(3) metric, so q and -q are the same rotation. On failure the combined message renders both poses and the measured position and rotation deltas, flagging which half exceeded its tolerance, so a position-only or orientation-only miss is read at a glance rather than from two independent assertions.
rotationToleranceDegrees is a geodesic angle in degrees, not a per-component delta. If you are replacing a two-call pattern that compared the orientation component-wise with IsApproximatelyEqualTo(expectedQuaternion, epsilon), do not reuse that component epsilon as rotationToleranceDegrees: the two measure different things. A 1e-6 component epsilon becomes an absurdly tight 1e-6 degrees, while a 0.5 component epsilon becomes a loose half-degree. Pick a fresh value in degrees that matches the angular precision the test actually needs (for example 1e-3 degrees for a near-exact round trip, 0.5 degrees for a solver result). As a rough intuition, for a unit quaternion a small rotation of θ radians moves each component by roughly θ/2, so a component tolerance ε corresponds to an angle near 2ε radians, or about 115·ε degrees.
IsPoseApproximatelyEqualTo operates on System.Numerics (Vector3 position, Quaternion orientation). If a pose arrives in another shape, for example a protobuf message with separate x/y/z and x/y/z/w fields, project it to System.Numerics first and assert on that:
static (Vector3 Position, Quaternion Orientation) ToNumerics(ProtoPose p) =>
(new Vector3(p.Position.X, p.Position.Y, p.Position.Z),
new Quaternion(p.Orientation.X, p.Orientation.Y, p.Orientation.Z, p.Orientation.W));
await Assert.That(ToNumerics(actual))
.IsPoseApproximatelyEqualTo(ToNumerics(expected),
positionTolerance: 1e-3, rotationToleranceDegrees: 0.5);double[] sample = [1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0];
await Assert.That(sample).HasMeanApproximately(3.0, tolerance: 1e-9);
await Assert.That(sample).HasStdDevApproximately(Math.Sqrt(2.5), tolerance: 1e-9);
await Assert.That(sample).HasPercentileApproximately(50.0, expected: 3.0, tolerance: 1e-9);var sphere = new Sphere(Vector3.Zero, 1f);
await Assert.That(sphere).ContainsPoint(new Vector3(0.3f, 0.3f, 0.3f));
var ray = new Ray3D(new Vector3(-3, 0, 0), Vector3.UnitX);
await Assert.That(ray).IntersectsSphere(sphere);Failures render the actual value against the expected value with the supplied tolerance, with no extra Console.WriteLine calls needed.
IsApproximatelyEqualTo mismatch:
Expected:
to be approximately equal to <1, 2, 99> component-wise within tolerance 0.001
Actual:
<1, 2, 3>
v0.2.0+ enriches the rendering with per-axis delta information directly in the failure message:
Expected:
to be approximately equal to <1, 2, 3.001> component-wise within tolerance 1E-06
actual: <1, 2, 3>
delta: (0, 0, 0.0009999275)
exceeded: Z (0.0009999275 > 1E-06)
The delta and exceeded values use general (G) numeric formatting with CultureInfo.InvariantCulture, so the rendered numbers carry full precision (including any float-to-double widening residue) rather than a rounded display form. The same pattern applies to every compound type (Vector2/Vector4/Quaternion/Matrix4x4/Plane/Complex/double[]/float[]) plus IsRotationallyEquivalentTo, IsGeometricallyEquivalentTo, and HasAxisAngleApproximately. The exact text format is not stable; see the Stability intent section.
[Test]
public async Task ComputedPositionIsApproximatelyAtTarget(CancellationToken ct)
{
Vector3 target = new(0.300f, 0.150f, 0.450f);
Vector3 actual = SolveTrajectory(input);
await Assert.That(actual).IsApproximatelyEqualTo(target, tolerance: 1e-3);
}IsApproximatelyEqualTo checks one numeric value against a literal expected within tolerance. To pin a whole pose (position and orientation together) as a snapshot baseline, render it to deterministic text with MathAssertions.Render.PoseRenderer and pin the result. A regression that flips a quaternion sign or swaps two pose fields then surfaces as a snapshot diff, even when each component still passes its own tolerance check.
using MathAssertions.Render;
[Test]
public async Task PoseMatchesBaseline(CancellationToken ct)
{
(Vector3 position, Quaternion orientation) = ComputePose(input);
var rendered = PoseRenderer.Render(position, orientation, tolerance: 1e-4);
await Assert.That(rendered).MatchesSnapshot();
}PoseRenderer lives in the framework-agnostic MathAssertions core and takes no dependency on a snapshot framework; MatchesSnapshot() is from the sibling SnapshotAssertions.TUnit package. The two-line composition is deliberate: the renderer never hard-depends on a snapshot framework. The quaternion is rendered verbatim (the sign is not canonicalized), so a q / -q flip is caught; the tolerance is recorded into the output, so a tolerance silently loosened during a refactor also shows up as a diff. The Render(position, tolerance) and Render(orientation, tolerance) overloads pin the position or orientation alone.
The pose assertions take System.Numerics types (Vector3 and Quaternion). A pose delivered over the wire as a protobuf message usually carries its own position and orientation message types with double (or float) fields. Project the protobuf pose to System.Numerics first, then assert. Keeping the projection in one small mapping helper (here ToVector3() / ToQuaternion()) means the assertion reads the same whether the pose came from a solver or a deserialized message.
// MyProtoPose is your generated protobuf message; ToVector3() / ToQuaternion()
// are your own one-line projections from its fields onto System.Numerics types.
private static Vector3 ToVector3(MyProtoPosition p) => new((float)p.X, (float)p.Y, (float)p.Z);
private static Quaternion ToQuaternion(MyProtoOrientation q) => new((float)q.X, (float)q.Y, (float)q.Z, (float)q.W);
[Test]
public async Task DecodedPoseMatchesExpected(CancellationToken ct)
{
MyProtoPose decoded = MyProtoPose.Parser.ParseFrom(payload);
await Assert.That((ToVector3(decoded.Position), ToQuaternion(decoded.Orientation)))
.IsPoseApproximatelyEqualTo(
(expectedPosition, expectedOrientation),
positionTolerance: 1e-3,
rotationToleranceDegrees: 0.5);
}A protobuf orientation is rarely a unit quaternion to the bit, and a default-initialized message leaves it as (0, 0, 0, 0). Both are handled: the orientation comparison normalizes before measuring the geodesic angle, and a non-normalizable (0, 0, 0, 0) falls back to a componentwise comparison, so a default-pose round-trip passes while a real mismatch still fails.
The IsApproximatelyEqualTo DSL works on any consumer-defined type via a one-line [GenerateAssertion] extension that calls MathTolerance.IsApproximatelyEqual on each component you care about. Your domain types stay in your own code; the package never sees them.
using MathAssertions;
using TUnit.Assertions.Attributes;
// In your test project, anywhere with a [GenerateAssertion]-eligible static class:
file static class PositionAssertions
{
[GenerateAssertion(
ExpectationMessage = "to be approximately equal to {expected} within tolerance {tolerance}",
InlineMethodBody = true)]
public static bool IsApproximatelyEqualTo(this MyPosition value, MyPosition expected, double tolerance)
=> MathTolerance.IsApproximatelyEqual(value.AsVector3(), expected.AsVector3(), tolerance);
}
// Now in tests:
await Assert.That(actualPosition).IsApproximatelyEqualTo(expectedPosition, tolerance: 1e-6);This is the design center of the package: consumers do not have to wait for upstream support of their types; they get a fluent DSL on whatever types they have, in five lines.
When per-axis diagnostics matter more than the package's failure-message format, fall back to the primitive:
using (Assert.Multiple())
{
await Assert.That(actual.X).IsCloseTo(target.X, 1e-3);
await Assert.That(actual.Y).IsCloseTo(target.Y, 1e-3);
await Assert.That(actual.Z).IsCloseTo(target.Z, 1e-3);
}Both axes report; the failure message names the failing one explicitly. A built-in per-axis-difference renderer that brings this granularity into the single IsApproximatelyEqualTo call is candidate work for a later release.
IsApproximatelyEqualTo is component-wise. Two unit quaternions q and -q represent the same physical rotation (the SO(3) double-cover) but fail component-wise comparison. If the production code may emit either sign of a unit quaternion (calibration outputs, slerp interpolation, normalization that picks a sign), use IsRotationallyEquivalentTo:
[Test]
public async Task RotationOutputMatchesExpected(CancellationToken ct)
{
Quaternion expected = Quaternion.CreateFromAxisAngle(Vector3.UnitY, MathF.PI / 4);
Quaternion actual = SolveOrientation(input); // may emit ±expected
// Component-wise: fails if SolveOrientation returned -expected
// await Assert.That(actual).IsApproximatelyEqualTo(expected, tolerance: 1e-6);
// Rotational: treats q and -q as the same rotation
await Assert.That(actual).IsRotationallyEquivalentTo(expected, tolerance: 1e-6);
}Use IsApproximatelyEqualTo when component identity matters (serialization roundtrips, exact storage formats). Use IsRotationallyEquivalentTo when geometric meaning matters (physical orientations, rotations applied to vectors). The implementation normalizes both inputs internally, so non-unit operands produce the correct rotational verdict.
IsApproximatelyEqualTo is component-wise on the plane equation (n.X, n.Y, n.Z, d). The same geometric plane has two valid representations: (n, d) and (-n, -d). If the production code constructs planes via different paths (three-point, normal-and-distance, normal-and-point), the sign of the normal may differ between expected and actual without changing the plane. Use IsGeometricallyEquivalentTo:
[Test]
public async Task GroundPlaneMatchesExpected(CancellationToken ct)
{
Plane expected = new(Vector3.UnitY, -1.0f); // y = 1
Plane actual = ComputeGroundPlane(input); // could be (UnitY, -1) or (-UnitY, 1)
await Assert.That(actual).IsGeometricallyEquivalentTo(expected, tolerance: 1e-6);
}Use IsApproximatelyEqualTo when normal direction is observable in the consumer (winding-aware shading, half-space convention). Use IsGeometricallyEquivalentTo when only the plane's geometry is observable.
When a transformation is invertible (f and its inverse g, where g(f(x)) == x within tolerance), MathTolerance.HasRoundtripIdentity(double input, Func<double,double> forward, Func<double,double> backward, double tolerance) checks the round-trip in one call. The primitive is double-only on purpose; consumers compose their own predicate for other types.
Three worked examples:
// 1. Sin and Asin compose back to the input within tolerance.
await Assert.That(MathTolerance.HasRoundtripIdentity(
0.42, Math.Sin, Math.Asin, tolerance: 1e-12)).IsTrue();
// 2. Degree / radian conversion.
await Assert.That(MathTolerance.HasRoundtripIdentity(
45.0,
d => d * Math.PI / 180.0,
r => r * 180.0 / Math.PI,
tolerance: 1e-12)).IsTrue();
// 3. Encode / decode, with consumer-supplied delegates wrapping the under-test API.
// Useful for serializer roundtrips when the encode / decode operate on a numeric
// representation (e.g. epoch milliseconds <-> DateTimeOffset). Both halves of the
// encode/decode round-trip are embedded inside the `forward` delegate; the `inverse`
// delegate is the identity cast that re-widens the long result back to the double
// the primitive operates on.
await Assert.That(MathTolerance.HasRoundtripIdentity(
epochMs,
forward: ms => DateTimeOffset.FromUnixTimeMilliseconds((long)ms).ToUnixTimeMilliseconds(),
inverse: ms => (double)ms, // identity widen; the encode/decode round-trip is in `forward`
tolerance: 0.5)).IsTrue();When the round-trip needs typed inputs (vector / quaternion / serializer pair), compose [GenerateAssertion] on your own type rather than chaining HasRoundtripIdentity: the primitive is intentionally double-only so the family does not lock in a particular cross-type roundtrip surface.
A zero-valued quaternion (all four components zero, length zero) is a valid in-memory state but not a valid rotation. Common cases: a protobuf default for an unpopulated Quaternion field, an in-construction calibration output that has not yet been written, an explicit "no rotation set" sentinel.
The BCL exposes Quaternion.Zero. The existing component-wise comparison handles the assertion without a specialized API:
[Test]
public async Task UnpopulatedRotationIsZeroSentinel(CancellationToken ct)
{
Quaternion actual = ReadRotationFromMessage(message);
await Assert.That(actual).IsApproximatelyEqualTo(Quaternion.Zero, tolerance: 1e-9);
}This reads as "the quaternion is approximately the zero quaternion" and fails for any rotation including the identity rotation Quaternion.Identity (which has W = 1). No specialized IsZeroQuaternion extension is needed; the BCL constant plus the existing component-wise comparison cover the case.
IsApproximatelyEqualTo, notIsCloseTo. TUnit core'sIsCloseTois for scalardouble/float; reusing the name on compound types would imply the same scalar-distance semantics and cause bugs.IsApproximatelyEqualTonames the compound, component-wise, NaN/infinity-aware comparison. There is no primitive fluentIsApproximatelyEqualTo(TUnit'sIsCloseToalready covers scalars); the coreMathTolerance.IsApproximatelyEqual(double, double, double)is available to[GenerateAssertion]authors.- Components widen to
double; tolerance is not narrowed tofloat. Adoubletolerance must be honored at full precision: casting it tofloatsilently rounds tight tolerances to zero and yields wrong "equal-to-itself" results. See Tolerance precision.
Match TUnit's IsCloseTo primitive semantics:
| Both | Comparison | Result |
|---|---|---|
| NaN | NaN | true (under any tolerance) |
| One NaN, other not | (anything) | false |
| Same-sign infinity | (anything) | true |
| Opposite-sign infinity | (anything) | false |
| Finite | Math.Abs(a - b) <= tolerance |
as expected |
| Tolerance is NaN or negative | (anything) | ArgumentOutOfRangeException at call time |
For the Vector3 overload, every component pair is evaluated against this table; the assertion passes iff all three pairs pass.
This is a 0.x release and the public API may evolve. Specifically:
- Additive changes (new entry points, new tolerance overloads, additional
System.Numericstypes) ship in any patch without breaking ApiCompat. Entry points present in a prior version remain present, with compatible signatures, in every subsequent release that targets the same TFM. - Breaking changes to existing signatures bump the minor version (0.X.0) and are called out in the CHANGELOG. v0.2.0 evolved the source-method return types of the compound
IsApproximatelyEqualTofamily frombooltoAssertionResultto enable rich per-component failure messages; the generated TUnit chain extensions (Assert.That(value).IsApproximatelyEqualTo(...)) are unaffected at the chain-syntax level. PackageValidationBaselineVersionpins to the previous shipped version, so ApiCompat breakage is caught at pack time. Strict-mode baseline validation captures additive changes and intentional API evolution as accepted entries inCompatibilitySuppressions.xml.
The 1.0 milestone signals API stability; see Limitations and future work for what's still being designed.
The catalog covers System.Numerics compounds (vectors, quaternions, matrices, planes, complex), span/tensor and array overloads, statistics, linear-algebra invariants, number theory, and Geometry3D primitives with containment, intersection, and point-distance. Everything below is demand-driven; nothing is committed.
- Depth: more Geometry3D (OrientedBox SAT, triangle-triangle, Hausdorff, RANSAC), statistics (distributions, correlation), mesh validity,
BigIntegernumber theory. ReadOnlyTensorSpan<T>fluent adapter: the staticMathToleranceoverload exists; the fluent form is blocked on TUnit capturing ref-struct values acrossawait.- Sibling adapters (
MathAssertions.MathNet.TUnit,MathAssertions.GeometRi.TUnit, and similar): separate packages, built on request.
Out of scope: statistical inference / hypothesis testing, symbolic math, 2D-Euclidean primitives in core (2D would arrive via an adapter), and production-code use.
The nine assertion-family packages: LogAssertions.TUnit, TimeAssertions.TUnit, SnapshotAssertions.TUnit, MathAssertions.TUnit, JsonAssertions.TUnit, SseAssertions.TUnit, GrpcAssertions.TUnit, TracingAssertions.TUnit, and MetricsAssertions.TUnit: release independently and target the same .NET TFM at any moment (LTS-anchored, multi-target during STS support windows; see the TFM policy in CONVENTIONS.md for the rotation schedule). Mix versions freely. Each package ships under SemVer with EnablePackageValidation strict-mode ApiCompat against its previous baseline, so binary breaks within a version line are caught at pack time.
For per-package release notes:
- LogAssertions.TUnit CHANGELOG
- SnapshotAssertions.TUnit CHANGELOG
- TimeAssertions.TUnit CHANGELOG
- MathAssertions.TUnit CHANGELOG
- JsonAssertions.TUnit CHANGELOG
- SseAssertions.TUnit CHANGELOG
- GrpcAssertions.TUnit CHANGELOG
- TracingAssertions.TUnit CHANGELOG
- MetricsAssertions.TUnit CHANGELOG
LogAssertions.TUnit: fluent log assertions overMicrosoft.Extensions.Logging.Testing.FakeLogCollector.SnapshotAssertions.TUnit: text-snapshot assertions for API-surface tests and similar deterministic-string scenarios. Coexists with Verify; covers the 80% case without coverage friction.TimeAssertions.TUnit: assertion-level timing budgets via.And.WithinTimeBudget(...). Compose with anyIsApproximatelyEqualTochain for combined value+timing assertions.JsonAssertions.TUnit: fluent JSON assertions overSystem.Text.Json, HTTP response bodies (including RFC 7807 ProblemDetails), and source-generatedJsonSerializerContextregistration.SseAssertions.TUnit: Server-Sent Events (SSE) wire-format assertions: event-count, field shape (event:,data:,id:,retry:), and stream content validation.GrpcAssertions.TUnit: fluent gRPC outcome assertions (ThrowsGrpcExceptionwithStatusCodeshorthands and detail refinements) plus theGrpcCallBuildertest-double helper.TracingAssertions.TUnit: fluent OpenTelemetry distributed-tracing (Activity/ span) assertions: operation name, tags, status, and parent/child and same-trace relationships, captured via a rawActivityListenerwith no OpenTelemetry SDK dependency.MetricsAssertions.TUnit: fluent assertions overSystem.Diagnostics.Metricsinstruments (counters, histograms, gauges), built onMetricCollector.
Issues and pull requests welcome. Before opening a PR:
- Run
dotnet buildanddotnet testlocally; the CI pipeline enforces the same quality bar (zero warnings as errors, 90% line / 90% branch coverage minimum). - Match the existing code style (
.editorconfigis authoritative;dotnet formatcovers formatting). - For new assertions, include a test for both the happy path and a representative failure case so the failure-message rendering is verified.
For larger ideas (new entry points, breaking changes, cross-cutting refactors), open a Discussion first to align on direction before investing implementation time.
See CONTRIBUTING.md for the full PR review checklist and API design principles, and CONVENTIONS.md for the family-wide code conventions shared across LogAssertions.TUnit, SnapshotAssertions.TUnit, TimeAssertions.TUnit, JsonAssertions.TUnit, SseAssertions.TUnit, and this repo.
MIT. Copyright (c) 2026 John Verheij.