Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2068816.2068836acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesimcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Q-score: proactive service quality assessment in a large IPTV system

Authors Info & Claims
Published:02 November 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

In large-scale IPTV systems, it is essential to maintain high service quality while providing a wider variety of service features than typical traditional TV. Thus service quality assessment systems are of paramount importance as they monitor the user-perceived service quality and alert when issues occurs. For IPTV systems, however, there is no simple metric to represent user-perceived service quality and Quality of Experience (QoE). Moreover, there is only limited user feedback, often in the form of noisy and delayed customer calls. Therefore, we aim to approximate the QoE through a selected set of performance indicators in a proactive (i.e., detect issues before customers reports to call centers) and scalable fashion.

In this paper, we present a service quality assessment framework, Q-score, which accurately learns a small set of performance indicators most relevant to user-perceived service quality, and proactively infers service quality in a single score. We evaluate Q-score using network data collected from a commercial IPTV service provider and show that Q-score is able to predict 60% of the service problems that are reported by customers with 0.1% false positives. Through Q-score, we have (i) gained insight into various types of service problems causing user dissatisfaction, including why users tend to react promptly to sound issues while late to video issues; (ii) identified and quantified the opportunity to proactively detect the service quality degradation of individual customers before severe performance impact occurs; and (iii) observed possibility to allocate customer care workforce to potentially troubling service areas before issues break out.

References

  1. Methods for subjective determination of transmission quality. ITU-T Rec. P.800, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. One-way transmission time. ITU-T Rec. G.114, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Objective perceptual multimedia video quality measurement in the presence of a full reference. ITU-T Rec. J.247, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Perceptual audiovisual quality measurement techniques for multimedia services over digital cable television networks in the presence of a reduced bandwidth reference. ITU-T Rec. J.246, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. R. Abreu, A. G. 0002, P. Zoeteweij, and A. J. C. van Gemund. Automatic software fault localization using generic program invariants. In SAC, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. R. Abreu, P. Zoeteweij, and A. J. C. van Gemund. Spectrum-based multiple fault localization. In ASE, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. P. Bahl, R. Chandra, A. Greenberg, S. Kandula, D. A. Maltz, and M. Zhang. Towards highly reliable enterprise network services via inference of multi-level dependencies. In Sigcomm, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. L. Breslau, D. Estrin, K. Fall, S. Floyd, J. Heidemann, A. Helmy, P. Huang, S. McCanne, K. Varadhan, Y. Xu, and H. Yu. Advances in network simulation. IEEE Computer, 33(5), 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. S. Chatterjee and A. S. Hadi. Influential observations, high leverage points, and outliers in linear regression. Statistical Science, Vol. 1:379--416, 1986.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. I. Cohen, J. S. Chase, M. Goldszmidt, T. Kelly, and J. Symons. Correlating instrumentation data to system states: A building block for automated diagnosis and control. In OSDI, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. A. E. Hoerl and R. W. Kennard. Ridge regression: Biased estimation for nonorthogonal problems. Technometrics, Vol. 12, No. 1:55--67, 1970.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. G. Holzmann. Design and Validation of Computer Protocols. Prentice-Hall, 1991. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Y. Jin, N. G. Duffield, A. Gerber, P. Haffner, S. Sen, and Z.-L. Zhang. Nevermind, the problem is already fixed: proactively detecting and troubleshooting customer dsl problems. In CoNEXT, page 7, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. S. Kandula, D. Katabi, and J.-P. Vasseur. Shrink: A tool for failure diagnosis in IP networks. In MineNet, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. S. Kandula, R. Mahajan, P. Verkaik, S. Agarwal, J. Padhye, and P. Bahl. Detailed diagnosis in enterprise networks. In ACM SIGCOMM, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. R. R. Kompella, J. Yates, A. Greenberg, and A. C. Snoeren. IP fault localization via risk modeling. In NSDI, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. T.-L. Lin, S. Kanumuri, Y. Zhi, D. Poole, P. Cosman, and A. R. Reibman. A versatile model for packet loss visibility and its application in packet prioritization. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, to appear, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. A. Mahimkar, Z. Ge, A. Shaikh, J. Wang, J. Yates, Y. Zhang, and Q. Zhao. Towards automated performance diagnosis in a large IPTV network. In ACM SIGCOMM, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. A. Mahimkar, H. H. Song, Z. Ge, A. Shaikh, J. Wang, J. Yates, Y. Zhang, and J. Emmons. Detecting the performance impact of upgrades in large operational networks. In ACM SIGCOMM, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. A. Mahimkar, J. Yates, Y. Zhang, A. Shaikh, J. Wang, Z. Ge, and C. T. Ee. Troubleshooting chronic conditions in large IP networks. In ACM CoNEXT, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. J. S. Moore and M. Kaufmann. Some key research problems in automated theorem proving for hardware and software verification. In RACSAM, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Perceptual evaluation of video quality. 2011. http://www.pevq.org.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. M. Pinson and S. Wolf. Comparing subjective video quality testing methodologies. In SPIE Video Communications and Image Processing Conference, pages 8--11, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. T. Qiu, J. Feng, Z. Ge, J. Wang, J. Xu, and J. Yates. Listen to me if you can: Tracking user experience of mobile network on social media. In IMC, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. K. Shen, C. Stewart, C. Li, and X. Li. Reference-driven performance anomaly identification. In SIGMETRICS, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. M. Steinder and A. Sethi. Increasing robustness of fault localization through analysis of lost, spurious, and positive symptoms. In Infocom, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. S. Tao, J. Apostolopoulos, and R. Guérin. Real-time monitoring of video quality in ip networks. In Proceedings of the international workshop on Network and operating systems support for digital audio and video, NOSSDAV'05, pages 129--134, New York, NY, USA, 2005. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. S. Tao, J. Apostolopoulos, and R. Guérin. Real-time monitoring of video quality in ip networks. IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw., 16:1052--1065, October 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. M. Tariq, A. Zeitoun, V. Valancius, N. Feamster, and M. Ammar. Answering what-if deployment and configuration questions with WISE. In SIGCOMM, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Q-score: proactive service quality assessment in a large IPTV system

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            IMC '11: Proceedings of the 2011 ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement conference
            November 2011
            612 pages
            ISBN:9781450310130
            DOI:10.1145/2068816

            Copyright © 2011 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 2 November 2011

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate277of1,083submissions,26%

            Upcoming Conference

            IMC '24
            ACM Internet Measurement Conference
            November 4 - 6, 2024
            Madrid , AA , Spain

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader