Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/1065983.1066013acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmmsysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Real-time monitoring of video quality in IP networks

Published:13 June 2005Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper investigates the problem of assessing the quality of video transmitted over IP networks. Our goal is to develop a methodology that is both reasonably accurate and simple enough to support the large-scale deployments that the increasing use of video over IP are likely to demand. For that purpose, we focus on developing an approach that is capable of mapping network statistics, e.g., packet losses, available from simple measurements, to the quality of video sequences reconstructed by receivers. A first step in that direction is a loss-distortion model that accounts for the impact of network losses on video quality, as a function of application-specific parameters such as the video codec and loss recovery technique, coded bit rate, packetization, video characteristics, etc. The model, although accurate, is poorly suited to large-scale, on-line monitoring, because of its dependency on many parameters that are difficult to estimate in real-time. As a result, we introduce a "relative quality" metric that bypasses this problem by measuring video quality against a quality benchmark that the network is expected to provide. The approach offers a lightweight video quality monitoring solution that is suitable for large-scale deployments. We assess its feasibility and accuracy through extensive simulations and experiments.

References

  1. W. Jiang and H. Schulzrinne. Modeling of packet loss and delay and their effect on real-time multimedia service quality. In Proc. NOSSDAV, June 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Y. J. Liang, J. G. Apostolopoulos, and B. Girod. Analysis of packet loss for compressed video: Does burst-length matter? In ICASSP, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. A. R. Reibman and V. Vaishampayan. Quality monitoring for compressed video subject to packet loss. In Proc. of IEEE ICME, July 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. A. R. Reibman, V. Vaishampayan, and Y. Sermadevi. Quality monitoring of video over a packet network. IEEE Trans. Multimedia, April 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. K. Stuhlmuller, N. Farber, M. Link, and B. Girod. Analysis of video transmission over lossy channels. IEEE J. Select. Areas Commun., June 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. S. Tao and R. Guerin. Application-specific path switching: A case study for streaming video. In Proc. of ACM Multimedia, October 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. S. Tao and R. Guerin. On-line estimation of Internet path performance: An application perspective. In Proc. of IEEE INFOCOM, March 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. VQEG. Final report on the validation of objective models of video quality assessment. http://www.vqeg.org/, August 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Real-time monitoring of video quality in IP networks

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      NOSSDAV '05: Proceedings of the international workshop on Network and operating systems support for digital audio and video
      June 2005
      210 pages
      ISBN:158113987X
      DOI:10.1145/1065983

      Copyright © 2005 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 13 June 2005

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate118of363submissions,33%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader