Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Sense information for disambiguation

Kenneth C. Litkowski
2002 Proceedings of the ACL-02 workshop on Word sense disambiguation recent successes and future directions -  
For SENSEVAL-2, we disambiguated the lexical sample using two different sense inventories. Official SENSEVAL-2 results were generated using WordNet, and separately using the New Oxford Dictionary of English (NODE). Since our initial submission, we have implemented additional routines and have now examined the differences in the features used for making sense selections. We report here the contribution of default sense selection, idiomatic usage, syntactic and semantic clues, subcategorization
more » ... tterns, word forms, syntactic usage, context, selectional preferences, and topics or subject fields. We also compare the differences between WordNet and NODE. Finally, we compare these features to those identified as significant in supervised learning approaches. 1 We have not yet determined how decisive these features are in making correct sense selections. The present study should be viewed as an examination of sense distinctions in lexical resources.
doi:10.3115/1118675.1118682 dblp:conf/semeval/Litkowski02a fatcat:urnklvk5ufbglnmztt72ibyixu