ABSTRACT
The reliability of measurements is crucial for ensuring the safety of control systems that depend on such measurements. Frequency-modulated continuous-wave (FMCW) radar is an active sensor used to measure distance and speed. Security evaluations of commercial FMCW radars have focused primarily on deception attacks, assuming that jamming attacks are easier to address. In this study, we propose a novel and efficient jamming attack called cover chirp jamming. This attack utilizes deception techniques and concentrates energy near the target, resulting in higher efficiency compared to conventional jamming methods. Furthermore, it can bypass existing countermeasures against noise, interference, and jamming. We demonstrate the effectiveness and feasibility of the attack through field and simulation experiments using a modern 77-GHz multi-input multi-output FMCW radar. Moreover, we propose a software-based countermeasure that detects and mitigates the attack. Our quantitative evaluation shows that the power of cover chirp jamming is 17.4 dB higher than conventional jamming. In addition, the countermeasure effectively mitigates the attack if the jamming-to-signal ratio (JSR) is below 0.6 dB, whereas the cover chirp jamming cannot be mitigated when the JSR exceeds 0.6 dB.
- Mostafa Alizadeh, George Shaker, João Carlos Martins De Almeida, Plinio Pelegrini Morita, and Safeddin Safavi-Naeini. 2019. Remote Monitoring of Human Vital Signs Using mm-Wave FMCW Radar. IEEE Access , Vol. 7 (2019), 54958--54968.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Francesco Belfiori, Wim van Rossum, and Peter Hoogeboom. 2012. Random transmission scheme approach for a FMCW TDMA coherent MIMO radar. In 2012 IEEE Radar Conference. IEEE, 0178--0183.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Alper Cemil and Mehmet Ünlü. 2022. Analysis of ADAS Radars with Electronic Warfare Perspective. Sensors, Vol. 22, 16 (2022), 6142.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ruchir Chauhan. 2014. A Platform for False Data Injection in Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave Radar. Master's thesis. Utah State University.Google Scholar
- Det8, ACC TRSS. 2000. ELECTRONIC WARFARE FUNDAMENTALS.Google Scholar
- ANALOG DEVICES. 2023. EVAL-DEMORAD Evaluation Board. https://www.analog.com/en/design-center/evaluation-hardware-and-software/evaluation-boards-kits/eval-demorad.html. Access 8 June 2023.Google Scholar
- Raj Gautam Dutta, Xiaolong Guo, Teng Zhang, Kevin Kwiat, Charles Kamhoua, Laurent Njilla, and Yier Jin. 2017. Estimation of Safe Sensor Measurements of Autonomous System Under Attack. In Proceedings of the 54th Annual Design Automation Conference 2017. 1--6.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Christoph Fischer, Hans Ludwig Blöcher, Jürgen Dickmann, and Wolfgang Menzel. 2015. Robust Detection and Mitigation of Mutual Interference in Automotive Radar. In 2015 16th International Radar Symposium (IRS). IEEE, 143--148.Google Scholar
- Soori Im, Donghoon Kim, Hoiyoung Cheon, and Jaekwan Ryu. 2021. Object Detection and Tracking System with Improved DBSCAN Clustering using Radar on Unmanned Surface Vehicle. In 2021 21st International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems (ICCAS). IEEE, 868--872.Google ScholarDigital Library
- ITU-T. 2018. Recommendation ITU-R M.2057--1: Systems characteristics of automotive radars operating in the frequency band 76--81 GHz for intelligent transport systems applications. Technical Report. International Telecommunication Union.Google Scholar
- Mohinder Jankiraman. 2018. FMCW Radar Design. Artech House.Google Scholar
- Prateek Kapoor, Ankur Vora, and Kyoung-Don Kang. 2018. Detecting and Mitigating Spoofing Attack Against an Automotive Radar. In 2018 IEEE 88th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC-Fall). IEEE, 1--6.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Eun Hee Kim and Ki Hyun Kim. 2018. Random phase code for automotive MIMO radars using combined frequency shift keying-linear FMCW waveform. IET Radar, Sonar & Navigation , Vol. 12, 10 (2018), 1090--1095.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rony Komissarov and Avishai Wool. 2021. Spoofing Attacks Against Vehicular FMCW Radar. In Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Attacks and Solutions in Hardware Security. 91--97.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Antonio Lazaro, Arnau Porcel, Marc Lazaro, Ramon Villarino, and David Girbau. 2022. Spoofing Attacks on FMCW Radars with Low-Cost Backscatter Tags. Sensors, Vol. 22, 6 (2022), 2145.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sohee Lim, Seongwook Lee, and Seong-Cheol Kim. 2018. Clustering of detected targets using DBSCAN in automotive radar systems. In 2018 19th international radar symposium (IRS). IEEE, 1--7.Google Scholar
- Wei Liu, Jin Meng, and Liang Zhou. 2019. Impact analysis of DRFM-based active jamming to radar detection efficiency. The Journal of Engineering , Vol. 2019, 20 (2019), 6856--6858.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Steffen Lutz, Daniel Ellenrieder, Thomas Walter, and Robert Weigel. 2014. On fast chirp modulations and compressed sensing for automotive radar applications. In 2014 15th International Radar Symposium (IRS). IEEE, 1--6.Google ScholarCross Ref
- MathWorks. 2023. Radar Signal Simulation and Processing for Automated Driving. https://www.mathworks.com/help/driving/ug/radar-signal-simulation-and-processing-for-automated-driving.html. Access 5 June 2023.Google Scholar
- Thomas Moon, Jounsup Park, and Seungmo Kim. 2022. BlueFMCW: Random frequency hopping radar for mitigation of interference and spoofing. EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing, Vol. 2022, 1 (2022), 1--17.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sriram Murali, Karthik Subburaj, Brian Ginsburg, and Karthik Ramasubramanian. 2018. Interference Detection in FMCW Radar Using A Complex Baseband Oversampled Receiver. In 2018 IEEE Radar Conference (RadarConf18). IEEE, 1567--1572.Google Scholar
- Prateek Nallabolu and Changzhi Li. 2021. A Frequency-Domain Spoofing Attack on FMCW Radars and Its Mitigation Technique Based on a Hybrid-Chirp Waveform. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, Vol. 69, 11 (2021), 5086--5098.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Prateek Nallabolu, Daniel Rodriguez, and Changzhi Li. 2022. Emulation and Malicious Attacks to Doppler and FMCW Radars for Human Sensing Applications. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques (2022).Google Scholar
- Shoei Nashimoto, Daisuke Suzuki, Noriyuki Miura, Tatsuya Machida, Kohei Matsuda, and Makoto Nagata. 2021. Low-cost distance-spoofing attack on FMCW radar and its feasibility study on countermeasure. Journal of Cryptographic Engineering (2021), 1--10.Google Scholar
- Sharef Neemat, Oleg Krasnov, and Alexander Yarovoy. 2018. An Interference Mitigation Technique for FMCW Radar Using Beat-Frequencies Interpolation in the STFT Domain. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, Vol. 67, 3 (2018), 1207--1220.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Fatemeh Norouzian, Anum Pirkani, Edward Hoare, Mikhail Cherniakov, and Marina Gashinova. 2021. Phenomenology of automotive radar interference. IET Radar, Sonar & Navigation , Vol. 15, 9 (2021), 1045--1060.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Takuya Nozawa, Yuya Makino, Nobuyuki Takaya, Masahiro Umehira, Shigeki Takeda, Xiaoyan Wang, and Hiroshi Kuroda. 2017. An Anti-collision Automotive FMCW Radar Using Time-domain Interference Detection and Suppression. (2017), 1--5.Google Scholar
- Zhengyu Peng and Changzhi Li. 2019. Portable microwave radar systems for short-range localization and life tracking: A review. Sensors, Vol. 19, 5 (2019), 1136.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Muhammad Rameez, Mats I Pettersson, and Mattias Dahl. 2022. Interference Compression and Mitigation for Automotive FMCW Radar Systems. IEEE Sensors Journal, Vol. 22, 20 (2022), 19739--19749.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sandeep Rao. 2017. Introduction to mmWave sensing: FMCW radars. Texas Instruments (TI) mmWave Training Series (2017), 1--11.Google Scholar
- Mark A Richards. 2014. Fundamentals of radar signal processing. McGraw-Hill Education.Google Scholar
- Sasanka Sanka. 2017. RADAR to RADAR Interference for 77GHz Automotive RADARs. Master's thesis. Delft University of Technology.Google Scholar
- Zhi Sun, Sarankumar Balakrishnan, Lu Su, Arupjyoti Bhuyan, Pu Wang, and Chunming Qiao. 2021. Who Is in Control? Practical Physical Layer Attack and Defense for mmWave-Based Sensing in Autonomous Vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security , Vol. 16 (2021), 3199--3214.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sefa Tanis. 2019. Automotive Radar and Congested Spectrum: Potential Urban Electronic Battlefield. MICROWAVE JOURNAL, Vol. 62, 1 (2019), 48--.Google Scholar
- Texas Instruments. 2023. AWR1243. https://www.ti.com/product/AWR1243. Access 5 June 2023.Google Scholar
- Onur Toker and Suleiman Alsweiss. 2020. Design of a Cyberattack Resilient 77 GHz Automotive Radar Sensor. Electronics, Vol. 9, 4 (2020), 573.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Masahiro Umehira, Takuya nozawa, Yuya makiko, wang Xiaoyan, Shigeki takeda, and Hiroshi kuroda. 2018. A Novel Iterative Inter-Radar Interference Reduction Scheme for Densely Deployed Automotive FMCW Radars. In 2018 19th International Radar Symposium (IRS). IEEE, 1--10.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Minh A Vu, William C Headley, and Kevin P Heaslip. 2022. A Comparative Overview of Automotive Radar Spoofing Countermeasures. In 2022 IEEE International Conference on Cyber Security and Resilience (CSR). IEEE, 245--252.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Matthias Wagner, Fisnik Sulejmani, Alexander Melzer, Paul Meissner, and Mario Huemer. 2018. Threshold-Free Interference Cancellation Method for Automotive FMCW Radar Systems. In 2018 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS). IEEE, 1--4.Google Scholar
- Christian Waldschmidt, Juergen Hasch, and Wolfgang Menzel. 2021. Automotive Radar--From First Efforts to Future Systems. IEEE Journal of Microwaves , Vol. 1, 1 (2021), 135--148.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jianping Wang. 2021. CFAR-Based Interference Mitigation for FMCW Automotive Radar Systems. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Vol. 23, 8 (2021), 12229--12238.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Chen Yan, Wenyuan Xu, and Jianhao Liu. 2016. Can You Trust Autonomous Vehicles: Contactless Attacks against Sensors of Self-driving Vehicle. DEF CON , Vol. 24 (2016). ioGoogle Scholar
Index Terms
- Cover Chirp Jamming: Hybrid Jamming--Deception Attack on FMCW Radar and Its Countermeasure
Recommendations
Mobile Jamming Attack and its Countermeasure in Wireless Sensor Networks
AINAW '07: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops - Volume 01Denial-of-Service (DoS) attacks are serious threats due to the resources constrained property in wireless sensor networks. Jamming attacks are the representative energy-consumption DoS attacks that can be launched easily. Hence, many countermeasures ...
Machine learning-based jamming attack classification and effective defense technique
Highlights- Novel jammer classification and effective defense (JCED) algorithm is proposed.
- Jammer types are effectively classified and suitable countermeasures are initiated.
- JCED achieves Higher effective throughput and lower energy ...
AbstractThe fourth industrial revolution has resulted in the intelligent Internet of Things being widely used for home networking applications and smart infrastructure. Consequently, wireless connectivity has become essential in industrial and daily-life ...
Jamming of LoRa PHY and Countermeasure
LoRaWAN forms a one-hop star topology where LoRa nodes send data via one-hop uplink transmission to a LoRa gateway. If the LoRa gateway can be jammed by attackers, it may not be able to receive any data from any nodes in the network. Our empirical study ...
Comments