Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3605769.3623990acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesccsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open Access

Cover Chirp Jamming: Hybrid Jamming--Deception Attack on FMCW Radar and Its Countermeasure

Published:26 November 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

The reliability of measurements is crucial for ensuring the safety of control systems that depend on such measurements. Frequency-modulated continuous-wave (FMCW) radar is an active sensor used to measure distance and speed. Security evaluations of commercial FMCW radars have focused primarily on deception attacks, assuming that jamming attacks are easier to address. In this study, we propose a novel and efficient jamming attack called cover chirp jamming. This attack utilizes deception techniques and concentrates energy near the target, resulting in higher efficiency compared to conventional jamming methods. Furthermore, it can bypass existing countermeasures against noise, interference, and jamming. We demonstrate the effectiveness and feasibility of the attack through field and simulation experiments using a modern 77-GHz multi-input multi-output FMCW radar. Moreover, we propose a software-based countermeasure that detects and mitigates the attack. Our quantitative evaluation shows that the power of cover chirp jamming is 17.4 dB higher than conventional jamming. In addition, the countermeasure effectively mitigates the attack if the jamming-to-signal ratio (JSR) is below 0.6 dB, whereas the cover chirp jamming cannot be mitigated when the JSR exceeds 0.6 dB.

References

  1. Mostafa Alizadeh, George Shaker, João Carlos Martins De Almeida, Plinio Pelegrini Morita, and Safeddin Safavi-Naeini. 2019. Remote Monitoring of Human Vital Signs Using mm-Wave FMCW Radar. IEEE Access , Vol. 7 (2019), 54958--54968.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Francesco Belfiori, Wim van Rossum, and Peter Hoogeboom. 2012. Random transmission scheme approach for a FMCW TDMA coherent MIMO radar. In 2012 IEEE Radar Conference. IEEE, 0178--0183.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Alper Cemil and Mehmet Ünlü. 2022. Analysis of ADAS Radars with Electronic Warfare Perspective. Sensors, Vol. 22, 16 (2022), 6142.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Ruchir Chauhan. 2014. A Platform for False Data Injection in Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave Radar. Master's thesis. Utah State University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Det8, ACC TRSS. 2000. ELECTRONIC WARFARE FUNDAMENTALS.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. ANALOG DEVICES. 2023. EVAL-DEMORAD Evaluation Board. https://www.analog.com/en/design-center/evaluation-hardware-and-software/evaluation-boards-kits/eval-demorad.html. Access 8 June 2023.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Raj Gautam Dutta, Xiaolong Guo, Teng Zhang, Kevin Kwiat, Charles Kamhoua, Laurent Njilla, and Yier Jin. 2017. Estimation of Safe Sensor Measurements of Autonomous System Under Attack. In Proceedings of the 54th Annual Design Automation Conference 2017. 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Christoph Fischer, Hans Ludwig Blöcher, Jürgen Dickmann, and Wolfgang Menzel. 2015. Robust Detection and Mitigation of Mutual Interference in Automotive Radar. In 2015 16th International Radar Symposium (IRS). IEEE, 143--148.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Soori Im, Donghoon Kim, Hoiyoung Cheon, and Jaekwan Ryu. 2021. Object Detection and Tracking System with Improved DBSCAN Clustering using Radar on Unmanned Surface Vehicle. In 2021 21st International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems (ICCAS). IEEE, 868--872.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. ITU-T. 2018. Recommendation ITU-R M.2057--1: Systems characteristics of automotive radars operating in the frequency band 76--81 GHz for intelligent transport systems applications. Technical Report. International Telecommunication Union.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Mohinder Jankiraman. 2018. FMCW Radar Design. Artech House.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Prateek Kapoor, Ankur Vora, and Kyoung-Don Kang. 2018. Detecting and Mitigating Spoofing Attack Against an Automotive Radar. In 2018 IEEE 88th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC-Fall). IEEE, 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Eun Hee Kim and Ki Hyun Kim. 2018. Random phase code for automotive MIMO radars using combined frequency shift keying-linear FMCW waveform. IET Radar, Sonar & Navigation , Vol. 12, 10 (2018), 1090--1095.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Rony Komissarov and Avishai Wool. 2021. Spoofing Attacks Against Vehicular FMCW Radar. In Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Attacks and Solutions in Hardware Security. 91--97.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Antonio Lazaro, Arnau Porcel, Marc Lazaro, Ramon Villarino, and David Girbau. 2022. Spoofing Attacks on FMCW Radars with Low-Cost Backscatter Tags. Sensors, Vol. 22, 6 (2022), 2145.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Sohee Lim, Seongwook Lee, and Seong-Cheol Kim. 2018. Clustering of detected targets using DBSCAN in automotive radar systems. In 2018 19th international radar symposium (IRS). IEEE, 1--7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Wei Liu, Jin Meng, and Liang Zhou. 2019. Impact analysis of DRFM-based active jamming to radar detection efficiency. The Journal of Engineering , Vol. 2019, 20 (2019), 6856--6858.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Steffen Lutz, Daniel Ellenrieder, Thomas Walter, and Robert Weigel. 2014. On fast chirp modulations and compressed sensing for automotive radar applications. In 2014 15th International Radar Symposium (IRS). IEEE, 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. MathWorks. 2023. Radar Signal Simulation and Processing for Automated Driving. https://www.mathworks.com/help/driving/ug/radar-signal-simulation-and-processing-for-automated-driving.html. Access 5 June 2023.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Thomas Moon, Jounsup Park, and Seungmo Kim. 2022. BlueFMCW: Random frequency hopping radar for mitigation of interference and spoofing. EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing, Vol. 2022, 1 (2022), 1--17.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Sriram Murali, Karthik Subburaj, Brian Ginsburg, and Karthik Ramasubramanian. 2018. Interference Detection in FMCW Radar Using A Complex Baseband Oversampled Receiver. In 2018 IEEE Radar Conference (RadarConf18). IEEE, 1567--1572.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Prateek Nallabolu and Changzhi Li. 2021. A Frequency-Domain Spoofing Attack on FMCW Radars and Its Mitigation Technique Based on a Hybrid-Chirp Waveform. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, Vol. 69, 11 (2021), 5086--5098.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Prateek Nallabolu, Daniel Rodriguez, and Changzhi Li. 2022. Emulation and Malicious Attacks to Doppler and FMCW Radars for Human Sensing Applications. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques (2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Shoei Nashimoto, Daisuke Suzuki, Noriyuki Miura, Tatsuya Machida, Kohei Matsuda, and Makoto Nagata. 2021. Low-cost distance-spoofing attack on FMCW radar and its feasibility study on countermeasure. Journal of Cryptographic Engineering (2021), 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Sharef Neemat, Oleg Krasnov, and Alexander Yarovoy. 2018. An Interference Mitigation Technique for FMCW Radar Using Beat-Frequencies Interpolation in the STFT Domain. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, Vol. 67, 3 (2018), 1207--1220.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Fatemeh Norouzian, Anum Pirkani, Edward Hoare, Mikhail Cherniakov, and Marina Gashinova. 2021. Phenomenology of automotive radar interference. IET Radar, Sonar & Navigation , Vol. 15, 9 (2021), 1045--1060.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Takuya Nozawa, Yuya Makino, Nobuyuki Takaya, Masahiro Umehira, Shigeki Takeda, Xiaoyan Wang, and Hiroshi Kuroda. 2017. An Anti-collision Automotive FMCW Radar Using Time-domain Interference Detection and Suppression. (2017), 1--5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Zhengyu Peng and Changzhi Li. 2019. Portable microwave radar systems for short-range localization and life tracking: A review. Sensors, Vol. 19, 5 (2019), 1136.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Muhammad Rameez, Mats I Pettersson, and Mattias Dahl. 2022. Interference Compression and Mitigation for Automotive FMCW Radar Systems. IEEE Sensors Journal, Vol. 22, 20 (2022), 19739--19749.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Sandeep Rao. 2017. Introduction to mmWave sensing: FMCW radars. Texas Instruments (TI) mmWave Training Series (2017), 1--11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Mark A Richards. 2014. Fundamentals of radar signal processing. McGraw-Hill Education.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Sasanka Sanka. 2017. RADAR to RADAR Interference for 77GHz Automotive RADARs. Master's thesis. Delft University of Technology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Zhi Sun, Sarankumar Balakrishnan, Lu Su, Arupjyoti Bhuyan, Pu Wang, and Chunming Qiao. 2021. Who Is in Control? Practical Physical Layer Attack and Defense for mmWave-Based Sensing in Autonomous Vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security , Vol. 16 (2021), 3199--3214.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Sefa Tanis. 2019. Automotive Radar and Congested Spectrum: Potential Urban Electronic Battlefield. MICROWAVE JOURNAL, Vol. 62, 1 (2019), 48--.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Texas Instruments. 2023. AWR1243. https://www.ti.com/product/AWR1243. Access 5 June 2023.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Onur Toker and Suleiman Alsweiss. 2020. Design of a Cyberattack Resilient 77 GHz Automotive Radar Sensor. Electronics, Vol. 9, 4 (2020), 573.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Masahiro Umehira, Takuya nozawa, Yuya makiko, wang Xiaoyan, Shigeki takeda, and Hiroshi kuroda. 2018. A Novel Iterative Inter-Radar Interference Reduction Scheme for Densely Deployed Automotive FMCW Radars. In 2018 19th International Radar Symposium (IRS). IEEE, 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Minh A Vu, William C Headley, and Kevin P Heaslip. 2022. A Comparative Overview of Automotive Radar Spoofing Countermeasures. In 2022 IEEE International Conference on Cyber Security and Resilience (CSR). IEEE, 245--252.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Matthias Wagner, Fisnik Sulejmani, Alexander Melzer, Paul Meissner, and Mario Huemer. 2018. Threshold-Free Interference Cancellation Method for Automotive FMCW Radar Systems. In 2018 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS). IEEE, 1--4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Christian Waldschmidt, Juergen Hasch, and Wolfgang Menzel. 2021. Automotive Radar--From First Efforts to Future Systems. IEEE Journal of Microwaves , Vol. 1, 1 (2021), 135--148.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Jianping Wang. 2021. CFAR-Based Interference Mitigation for FMCW Automotive Radar Systems. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Vol. 23, 8 (2021), 12229--12238.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Chen Yan, Wenyuan Xu, and Jianhao Liu. 2016. Can You Trust Autonomous Vehicles: Contactless Attacks against Sensors of Self-driving Vehicle. DEF CON , Vol. 24 (2016). ioGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Cover Chirp Jamming: Hybrid Jamming--Deception Attack on FMCW Radar and Its Countermeasure

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)220
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)37

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader