Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3468691.3468729acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescniotConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Key node and network performance analysis of 5G smart power plant based on complex network

Authors Info & Claims
Published:07 August 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

5G can better meet the security, reliability and flexibility requirements of power grid business, and realize differentiated service guarantee. Power optical network, as the cornerstone of the State Grid "big cloud mobile intelligent chain" technology development and business carrying, its service quality is directly related to the security of system operation, the stability of system control, the quality of power transmission and the response speed of the system. In this paper, the complex network theory is used to analyze the important parameters of power network. And the performance parameters of the network are modeled. The simulation platform is built to analyze the optical network of the western power grid and a smart power plant in the United States. The analysis results show that the key nodes in the network have a crucial impact on the performance of the network. We need to focus on the protection of this kind of node to avoid the sharp decline of network performance due to the failure of this kind of node.

References

  1. Sabidussi G. 1966. The centrality index of a graph[J]. Psychometrika, 31(4):581-603.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Freeman L C. 1977. A Set of Measures of Centrality Based on Betweenness[J]. Sociometry, 40(1):35-41.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Newman M E J. 2006. Finding community structure in networks using the eigenvectors of matrices[J]. PhRvE, 74.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Bryan K , Leise T. 2006. The $25,000,000,000 Eigenvector: The Linear Algebra behind Google[J]. SIAM Review, 48(3):569-581.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Berkhin, Pavel. 2005. A Survey on PageRank Computing[J]. Internet Mathematics, 2(1):73-120.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Duanbing Chen, Linyuan Lü, Ming-Sheng Shang, 2012. Identifying influential nodes in complex networks[J]. Physical A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications,391(4).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Tingyuan Nie, Zheng Guo, 2016. Using mapping entropy to identify node centrality in complex networks[J]. Physical A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications,453.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Kitsak M , Gallos L K , Havlin S , 2010. Identification of influential spreaders in complex networks[J]. Nature Physics, 6(11).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Zhuoming Ren, Feng Shao, Jianguo Liu, 2013. Node importance measurement based on the degree and clustering coefficient information[J]. Acta Physica Sinica, 62(12): 128901-1-128901-5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Runze Wu, Wanxu Wu, Li Li, 2019. Topology diagnosis of power communication network based on node influence [J]. Power System Protection and Control, 047(010):147-155.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Lu Xiang, Wang Wenye, Ma Jianfeng.An empirical study of communication infrastructures towards the smart grid : design, implementation, and evaluation[J].IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2013, 4(1):170-183.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Wang Wenye, Xu Yi, Khanna M.A survey on the communication architectures in smart grid[J].Computer Networks, 2011, 55(15):3604-3629.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Ancillotti E, Bruno R, Conti M.The role of communication systems in smart grids:Architectures, technical solutions and research challenges[J].Computer Communications, 2013, 36(17-18):1665-1697.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Vespignani A.Complex networks:the fragility of interdependency[J].Nature, 2010, 464(7291):984-985.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Buldyrev S V, Parshani, R, Paul G, et al.Catastrophic cascade of failures in interdependent networks[J].Nature, 2010, 464(7291):1025-1028.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Bobbio A, Bonanni G, Ciancamerla E, et al.Unavailability of critical SCADA communication links interconnecting a power grid and a Telco network[J].Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2010, 95(12):1345-1357.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Xue Yusheng, Xiao Shijie. A Perspective on generalized congestion in power systems from the Blackout in India. Power system automation,2012,36(16):1-8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Tang Siqing, Zhang Mi, Li Jianshe Analysis and summary of the "September 26" power outage in Hainan Power Grid. Power System Automation,2006(01):1-7+16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Key node and network performance analysis of 5G smart power plant based on complex network
              Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

              Recommendations

              Comments

              Login options

              Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

              Sign in
              • Published in

                cover image ACM Other conferences
                CNIOT '21: Proceedings of the 2021 2nd International Conference on Computing, Networks and Internet of Things
                May 2021
                270 pages
                ISBN:9781450389693
                DOI:10.1145/3468691

                Copyright © 2021 ACM

                Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                Publisher

                Association for Computing Machinery

                New York, NY, United States

                Publication History

                • Published: 7 August 2021

                Permissions

                Request permissions about this article.

                Request Permissions

                Check for updates

                Qualifiers

                • research-article
                • Research
                • Refereed limited

                Acceptance Rates

                Overall Acceptance Rate39of82submissions,48%
              • Article Metrics

                • Downloads (Last 12 months)6
                • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

                Other Metrics

              PDF Format

              View or Download as a PDF file.

              PDF

              eReader

              View online with eReader.

              eReader

              HTML Format

              View this article in HTML Format .

              View HTML Format