Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3219617.3219629acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmetricsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

An Optimal Randomized Online Algorithm for QoS Buffer Management

Published:12 June 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

The QoS buffer management problem, with significant and diverse computer applications, e.g., in online cloud resource allocation problems, is a classic online admission control problem in the presence of resource constraints. In its basic setting, packets with different values, arrive in online fashion to a switching node with limited buffer size. Then, the switch needs to make an immediate decision to either admit or reject the incoming packet based on the value of the packet and its buffer availability. The objective is to maximize the cumulative profit of the admitted packets, while respecting the buffer constraint. Even though the QoS buffer management problem was proposed more than a decade ago, no optimal online solution has been proposed in the literature. This paper proposes an optimal randomized online algorithm for this problem.

References

  1. W. Aiello, Y. Mansour, S. Rajagopolan, and A. Rosén. Competitive queue policies for differentiated services. In Proc. of IEEE INFOCOM, pages 431--440, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. N. Andelman and Y. Mansour. Competitive management of non-preemptive queues with multiple values. In Proc. of DISC, pages 166--180, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. A. Kesselman, Z. Lotker, Y. Mansour, B. Patt-Shamir, and B. Schieber. Buffer overflow management in QoS switches. SIAM Journal on Computing, 33(3), 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. E. Mohr, I. Ahmad, and G. Schmidt. Online algorithms for conversion problems: a survey. Surveys in Operations Research and Management Science, 19(2), 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. L. Yang, M. H. Hajiesmaili, H. Yi, and M. Chen. Hour-ahead offering strategies in electricity market for power producers with storage and intermittent supply. In Proc. of ACM SIGMETRICS, 2017. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. L. Yang, W. S. Wong, and M. H. Hajiesmaili. An optimal randomized online algorithm for qos buffer management. Proc. ACM Meas. Anal. Comput. Syst., 1(2):36:1--36:26, December 2017. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Z. Zhang, Z. Li, and C. Wu. Optimal posted prices for online cloud resource allocation. Proceedings of the ACM on Measurement and Analysis of Computing Systems, 1(1):23, 2017. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. An Optimal Randomized Online Algorithm for QoS Buffer Management

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SIGMETRICS '18: Abstracts of the 2018 ACM International Conference on Measurement and Modeling of Computer Systems
        June 2018
        155 pages
        ISBN:9781450358460
        DOI:10.1145/3219617

        Copyright © 2018 Owner/Author

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 12 June 2018

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • extended-abstract

        Acceptance Rates

        SIGMETRICS '18 Paper Acceptance Rate54of270submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate459of2,691submissions,17%
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader