Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3208903.3208924acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagese-energyConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Adaptive User-Oriented Direct Load-Control of Residential Flexible Devices

Published:12 June 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Demand Response (DR) schemes are effective tools to maintain a dynamic balance in energy markets with higher integration of fluctuating renewable energy sources. DR schemes can be used to harness residential devices' flexibility and to utilize it to achieve social and financial objectives. However, existing DR schemes suffer from low user participation as they fail at taking into account the users' requirements. First, DR schemes are highly demanding for the users, as users need to provide direct information, e.g. via surveys, on their energy consumption preferences. Second, the user utility models based on these surveys are hard-coded and do not adapt over time. Third, the existing scheduling techniques require the users to input their energy requirements on a daily basis. As an alternative, this paper proposes a DR scheme for user-oriented direct load-control of residential appliances operations. Instead of relying on user surveys to evaluate the user utility, we propose an online data-driven approach for estimating user utility functions, purely based on available load consumption data, that adaptively models the users' preference over time. Our scheme is based on a day-ahead scheduling technique that transparently prescribes the users with optimal device operation schedules that take into account both financial benefits and user-perceived quality of service. To model day-ahead user energy demand and flexibility, we propose a probabilistic approach for generating flexibility models under uncertainty. Results on both real-world and simulated datasets show that our DR scheme can provide significant financial benefits while preserving the user-perceived quality of service.

References

  1. 2012. Source of Dataset: INTrEPID, INTelligent systems for Energy Prosumer buildIngs at District level, funded by the European Commission under FP7, Grant Agreement N. 317983. http://www.fp7-intrepid.eu/. (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2013. The MIRABEL Project, 2013. http://www.mirabel-project.eu.. (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Christopher O Adika and Lingfeng Wang. 2014. Autonomous appliance scheduling for household energy management. IEEE transactions on smart grid 5, 2 (2014), 673--682.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Mostafa F Astaneh, Bishnu P Bhattarai, Birgitte Bak-Jensen, Weihao Hu, Jayakrishnan R Pillai, and Zhe Chen. 2015. A novel technique to enhance demand responsiveness: An EV based test case. In Power and Energy Engineering Conference (APPEEC), 2015 IEEE PES Asia-Pacific. IEEE, 1--5.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Matthias Boehm, Lars Dannecker, Andreas Doms, Erik Dovgan, Bogdan Filipič, Ulrike Fischer, Wolfgang Lehner, Torben Bach Pedersen, Yoann Pitarch, Laurynas Šikšnys, and Tea Tušar. 2012. Data Management in the MIRABEL Smart Grid System. In Proceedings of the 2012 Joint EDBT/ICDT Workshops (EDBT-ICDT '12). 95--102. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Ruilong Deng, Zaiyue Yang, Mo-Yuen Chow, and Jiming Chen. 2015. A survey on demand response in smart grids: Mathematical models and approaches. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics 11, 3 (2015), 570--582.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Chris Develder, Nasrin Sadeghianpourhamami, Matthias Strobbe, and Nazir Refa. 2016. Quantifying flexibility in EV charging as DR potential: Analysis of two real-world data sets. In Smart Grid Communications (SmartGridComm), 2016 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 600--605.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Murat Fahrioglu and Fernando L Alvarado. 2001. Using utility information to calibrate customer demand management behavior models. IEEE transactions on power systems 16, 2 (2001), 317--322.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Sebastian Gottwalt, Johannes Gärttner, Hartmut Schmeck, and Christof Weinhardt. 2017. Modeling and valuation of residential demand flexibility for renewable energy integration. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid 8, 6 (2017), 2565--2574.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Gerwin Hoogsteen, Albert Molderink, Johann L Hurink, and Gerard JM Smit. 2016. Generation of flexible domestic load profiles to evaluate demand side management approaches. In Energy Conference (ENERGYCON), 2016 IEEE International. IEEE, 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Sayed Saeed Hosseini, Kodjo Agbossou, Sousso Kelouwani, and Alben Cardenas. 2017. Non-intrusive load monitoring through home energy management systems: A comprehensive review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 79 (2017), 1266--1274.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Samuel Humeau, Tri Kurniawan Wijaya, Matteo Vasirani, and Karl Aberer. 2013. Electricity load forecasting for residential customers: Exploiting aggregation and correlation between households. In Sustainable Internet and ICT for Sustainability (SustainIT), 2013. IEEE, 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. JQ James, Junhao Lin, Albert YS Lam, and Victor OK Li. 2016. Maximizing aggregator profit through energy trading by coordinated electric vehicle charging. In Smart Grid Communications (SmartGridComm), 2016 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 497--502.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Rikke Hagensby Jensen, Jesper Kjeldskov, and Mikael B Skov. 2016. HeatDial: Beyond User Scheduling in Eco-Interaction. In Proceedings of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. ACM, 74. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Rikke Hagensby Jensen, Dimitrios Raptis, Jesper Kjeldskov, and Mikael B Skov. 2018. Washing with the Wind: A Study of Scripting towards Sustainability. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Jin-Ho Kim and Anastasia Shcherbakova. 2011. Common failures of demand response. Energy 36, 2 (2011), 873--880.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Elke Klaassen, Charlotte Kobus, Jasper Frunt, and Han Slootweg. 2016. Load shifting potential of the washing machine and tumble dryer. In Energy Conference (ENERGYCON), 2016 IEEE International. IEEE, 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Charlotte BA Kobus, Elke AM Klaassen, Ruth Mugge, and Jan PL Schoormans. 2015. A real-life assessment on the effect of smart appliances for shifting households electricity demand. Applied Energy 147 (2015), 335--343.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Wouter Labeeuw, Jeroen Stragier, and Geert Deconinck. 2015. Potential of active demand reduction with residential wet appliances: A case study for Belgium. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid 6, 1 (2015), 315--323.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Na Li, Lijun Chen, and Steven H Low. 2011. Optimal demand response based on utility maximization in power networks. In Power and Energy Society General Meeting, 2011 IEEE. IEEE, 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Jinghuan Ma, He Henry Chen, Lingyang Song, and Yonghui Li. 2016. Residential load scheduling in smart grid: A cost efficiency perspective. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid 7, 2 (2016), 771--784.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Bijay Neupane, Torben Bach Pedersen, and Bo Thiesson. 2014. Towards flexibility detection in device-level energy consumption. In International Workshop on Data Analytics for Renewable Energy Integration. Springer, 1--16. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Bijay Neupane, Torben Bach Pedersen, and Bo Thiesson. 2015. Evaluating the Value of Flexibility in Energy Regulation Markets. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM Sixth International Conference on Future Energy Systems. ACM, 131--140. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Bijay Neupane, Laurynas Šikšnys, and Torben Bach Pedersen. 2017. Generation and Evaluation of Flex-Offers from Flexible Electrical Devices. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Future Energy Systems. ACM, 143--156. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Alexandra-Gwyn Paetz, Thomas Kaschub, Patrick Jochem, and Wolf Fichtner. 2013. Load-shifting potentials in households including electric mobility-A comparison of user behaviour with modelling results. In European Energy Market (EEM), 2013 10th International Conference on the. IEEE, 1--7.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Nikolaos G Paterakis, Ozan Erdinc, Anastasios G Bakirtzis, and João PS Catalão. 2015. Optimal household appliances scheduling under day-ahead pricing and load-shaping demand response strategies. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics 11, 6 (2015), 1509--1519.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Dimitrios Raptis, Rikke Hagensby Jensen, Jesper Kjeldskov, and Mikael B Skov. 2017. Aesthetic, Functional and Conceptual Provocation in Research Through Design. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. ACM, 29--41. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Andreas Reinhardt, Delphine Christin, and Salil S Kanhere. 2014. Can smart plugs predict electric power consumption?: a case study. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems: Computing, Networking and Services. ICST (Institute for Computer Sciences, Social-Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering), 257--266. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Pedram Samadi, Hamed Mohsenian-Rad, Robert Schober, and Vincent WS Wong. 2012. Advanced demand side management for the future smart grid using mechanism design. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid 3, 3 (2012), 1170--1180.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Ditiro Setlhaolo, Xiaohua Xia, and Jiangfeng Zhang. 2014. Optimal scheduling of household appliances for demand response. Electric Power Systems Research 116 (2014), 24--28.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Laurynas Šikšnys, Emmanouil Valsomatzis, Katja Hose, and Torben Bach Pedersen. 2015. Aggregating and disaggregating flexibility objects. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 27, 11 (2015), 2893--2906. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Kai Man Tsui and Shing-Chow Chan. 2012. Demand response optimization for smart home scheduling under real-time pricing. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid 3, 4 (2012), 1812--1821.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Emmanouil Valsomatzis, Katja Hose, Torben Bach Pedersen, and Laurynas Siksnys. 2015. Measuring and Comparing Energy Flexibilities. In EDBT/ICDT Workshops. 78--85.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Emmanouil Valsomatzis, Torben Bach Pedersen, Alberto Abelló, and Katja Hose. 2016. Aggregating energy flexibilities under constraints. In Smart Grid Communications (SmartGridComm), 2016 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 484--490.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. John S Vardakas, Nizar Zorba, and Christos V Verikoukis. 2015. A survey on demand response programs in smart grids: Pricing methods and optimization algorithms. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 17, 1 (2015), 152--178.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Laurynas Šikšnys and Torben Bach Pedersen. 2016. Dependency-based FlexOffers: Scalable Management of Flexible Loads with Dependencies. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Future Energy Systems (e-Energy '16). 1--13. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Rayoung Yang, Mark W Newman, and Jodi Forlizzi. 2014. Making sustainability sustainable: challenges in the design of eco-interaction technologies. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 823--832. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Datong Zhou, Maximilian Balandat, and Claire Tomlin. 2016. Residential demand response targeting using machine learning with observational data. In Decision and Control (CDC), 2016 IEEE 55th Conference on. IEEE, 6663--6668.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    e-Energy '18: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Future Energy Systems
    June 2018
    657 pages
    ISBN:9781450357678
    DOI:10.1145/3208903

    Copyright © 2018 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 12 June 2018

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate160of446submissions,36%

    Upcoming Conference

    e-Energy '24

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader