Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3207677.3278004acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescsaeConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

An Evaluation Method of Acceptable and Failed Spot Welding Products Based on Image Classification with Transfer Learning Technique

Authors Info & Claims
Published:22 October 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

The1 spot welding technique is widely used in the industrial production line, but it suffers inconsistent quality. Therefore, the evaluation of the spot-welding product is of great importance for the industrial production. Many destructive and nondestructive methods have been used in the product evaluation, but they are inefficient and hard to be applied in the mass production. In recent year, machine vision method has been used to differentiate the acceptable and failed spot welding products according to their solder joint images. This opened new opportunities for the spot welding product quality evaluation using digital image technique. However, this method cannot achieve general performance on different spot-welding products as well as ideal classification accuracy. In this work, a novel method which based on the transfer learning technique was proposed to classify the spot-welding products according to their solder joint images. The GoogLeNet was used to extract the features of the solder joint image, which is pretrained on the ImageNet. Then a multilayer perceptron (MLP) was used to classify these images. Our method achieved a final classification accuracy of 96.99% on a testing set included 334 images.

References

  1. Ishaya ZD, Dauda M, and Pam GY, et al. 2013. Destructive testing and production system integrity. Advances in Applied Science Research, 4, 4(2013), 184--189.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Xiaodong Wan, Yuanxun Wang and Dawei Zhao. 2018. Quality Estimation in Small Scale Resistance Spot Welding of Titanium Alloy Based on Dynamic Electrical Signals. ISIJ International, 58, 4(2018), 721--726.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Xingjue Wang, and Junhong Zhou, et al. 2018. Quality monitoring of spot welding with advanced signal processing and data-driven techniques. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control, 40, 7(2018), 2291--2302.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Hongjie Zhang, and Yanyan Hou, et al. 2015. A new method for nondestructive quality evaluation of the resistance spot welding based on the radar chart method and the decision tree classifier. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 78, 5--8(2015), 841--851.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Samo Simončič and Primož Podržaj. 2012. Image-based electrode tip displacement in resistance spot welding. Measurement Science and Technology, 23, 6(2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Marco Leo a, and Marco Del Coco a, et al. 2018. Automatic visual monitoring of welding procedure in stainless steel kegs. Optics and Lasers in Engineering, 104, SI(2018), 220--231.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Wenhui Hou, and Ye Wei, et al. 2018. Automatic Detection of Welding Defects using Deep Neural Network. 10th International Conference on Computer and Electrical Engineering, Univ Alberta, Edmonton, CANADA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Zhuang Ni, and Yan Yan, et al. 2018. Multi-label learning based deep transfer neural network for facial attribute classification. Pattern Recognition, 80, 225--240.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Boufenar, Chaouki, Kerboua, Adlen, Batouche, and Mohamed. 2017. Investigation on deep learning for off-line handwritten Arabic character recognition. Cognitive Systems Research, 50, 180--195.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Lei, Haijun, and Han, Tao, et al. 2018. A deeply supervised residual network for HEp-2 cell classification via cross-modal transfer learning. Pattern Recognition, 79, 290--302.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. G Christian Szegedy, and Wei Liu, et al. 2015. going deeper with convolutions. 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Boston, MA, 1--9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Mohammed Al-Qizwini, and Iman Barjasteh, et al. 2017. Deep Learning Algorithm for Autonomous Driving using GoogLeNet. 2017 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), Redondo Beach, CA, 89--96.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Singla A, Yuan L, and Ebrahimi T. 2016. Food/Non-food Image Classification and Food Categorization using Pre-Trained GoogLeNet Model. International Workshop on Multimedia Assisted Dietary Management, ACM, Amsterdam, NETHERLANDS, 3--11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Zhuoyao Zhong, Lianwen Jin, and Zecheng Xie. 2015. High Performance Offline Handwritten Chinese Character Recognition Using GoogLeNet and Directional Feature Maps. 13th IAPR International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR), Nancy, FRANCE, 846--850. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Atkinson, P.M., and Tatnall, A.R.L. 1997. Introduction neural networks in remote sensing. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 18, 4(1997), 699--709.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. F. Del Frate, F. Pacifici, G. Schiavon, and C. Solimini. 2007. Use of neural networks for automatic classification from high-resolution images. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens, 45, 800--809.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Glorot, X., Bordes, A., and Bengio, Y. 2011. Deep sparse rectifier neural networks. International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics 2011, AISTATS, 15, 315--323.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Wang, Feng, and Cheng, Jian, et al. 2018. Additive Margin Softmax for Face Verification. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 25, 7(2018), 926--930.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. SHORE, JE, and JOHNSON, RW. 1980. axiomatic derivation of the principle of maximum-entropy and the principle of minimum cross-entropy. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 26, 1(1980), 26--37. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Hu, Kai, and Zhang, Zhenzhen, et al. 2018. Retinal vessel segmentation of color fundus images using multiscale convolutional neural network with an improved cross-entropy loss function. Nurocomputing, 309, 179--191.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Pereira, Sergio, Pinto, and Adriano, et al. 2016. Brain Tumor Segmentation Using Convolutional Neural Networks in MRI Images. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 35, 5(2016), 1240--1251.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. An Evaluation Method of Acceptable and Failed Spot Welding Products Based on Image Classification with Transfer Learning Technique

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        CSAE '18: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Computer Science and Application Engineering
        October 2018
        1083 pages
        ISBN:9781450365123
        DOI:10.1145/3207677

        Copyright © 2018 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 22 October 2018

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        CSAE '18 Paper Acceptance Rate189of383submissions,49%Overall Acceptance Rate368of770submissions,48%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader