Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3041021.3054168acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswwwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

HiText: Text Reading with Dynamic Salience Marking

Published:03 April 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

The staggering amounts of content readily available to us via digital channels can often appear overwhelming. While much research has focused on aiding people at selecting relevant articles to read, only few approaches have been developed to assist readers in more efficiently reading an individual text. In this paper, we present HiText, a simple yet effective way of dynamically marking parts of a document in accordance with their salience. Rather than skimming a text by focusing on randomly chosen sentences, students and other readers can direct their attention to sentences determined to be important by our system. For this, we rely on a deep learning-based sentence ranking method. Our experiments show that this results in marked increases in user satisfaction and reading efficiency, as assessed using TOEFL-style reading comprehension tests.

References

  1. F. Ahmed, Y. Borodin, Y. Puzis, and I. V. Ramakrishnan. Why read if you can skim: Towards enabling faster screen reading. In Proc. W4A, pages 39:1--39:10, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. P. L. Carrell. Facilitating esl reading by teaching text structure. TESOL Quarterly, 19(4):727--752, 1985.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. J. Chen, N. Tandon, C. D. Hariman, and G. de Melo. WebBrain: Joint neural learning of large-scale commonsense knowledge. In Proc. ISWC, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. E. H. Chi, L. Hong, M. Gumbrecht, and S. K. Card. Scent Highlights: Highlighting conceptually-related sentences during reading. In Proc. IUI, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. J. Chung, Ç. Gülçehre, K. Cho, and Y. Bengio. Empirical evaluation of gated recurrent neural networks on sequence modeling. CoRR, abs/1412.3555, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. D. Das and A. F. T. Martins. A survey on automatic text summarization. Technical report, Carnegie Mellon University, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. G. de Melo. Inducing conceptual embedding spaces from Wikipedia. In Proc. WWW 2017 (Cognitive Computing Track). ACM, 2017. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. G. B. Duggan and S. J. Payne. Skim reading by satisficing: Evidence from eye tracking. In Proc. CHI 2011, pages 1141--1150. ACM, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. G. Erkan and D. R. Radev. Lexrank: Graph-based lexical centrality as salience in text summarization. J. Artif. Int. Res., 22(1):457--479, Dec. 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. D. J. Gillick. The Elements of Automatic Summarization. PhD thesis, EECS Department, University of California, Berkeley, May 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. S. Hochreiter and J. Schmidhuber. Long short-term memory. Neural Comput., 9(9):1735--1780, Nov. 1997.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. N. Kalchbrenner and P. Blunsom. Recurrent continuous translation models. In Proc. EMNLP, pages 1700--1709. ACL, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. D. Kingery and R. Furuta. Skimming electronic newspaper headlines: a study of typeface, point size, screen resolution, and monitor size. Inf. Process. Manage., 33(5):685--696, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. R. Kiros, Y. Zhu, R. Salakhutdinov, R. S. Zemel, A. Torralba, R. Urtasun, and S. Fidler. Skip-thought vectors. CoRR, abs/1506.06726, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. X. Long, C. Gan, and G. de Melo. Video captioning with multi-faceted attention. CoRR, abs/1612.00234, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. E. Loza Mencía, G. de Melo, and J. Nam. Medical concept embeddings via labeled background corpora. In Proc. LREC, Paris, France, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. H. P. Luhn. The automatic creation of literature abstracts. IBM Journal of Research and Development, 2(2):159--165, 1958. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. M.-T. Luong, H. Pham, and C. D. Manning. Effective approaches to attention-based neural machine translation. In Proc. EMNLP, pages 1412--1421, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. A. Nenkova and K. McKeown. A survey of text summarization techniques. In Mining Text Data. 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. A. Nenkova and L. Vanderwende. The impact of frequency on summarization. Microsoft Research, Redmond, Washington, Tech. Rep. MSR-TR-2005-101, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. V. d. Paiva, D. Oliveira, S. Higuchi, A. Rademaker, and G. de Melo. Exploratory information extraction from a historical dictionary. In Proc. Workshop on Digital Humanities and e-Science at the 10th IEEE International Conference on e-Science, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. E. Pitler and A. Nenkova. Revisiting readability: A unified framework for predicting text quality. In Proc. EMNLP, pages 186--195, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. D. N. Rapp and P. Broek. Dynamic text comprehension: An integrative view of reading. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(5):276--279, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. I. Sutskever, O. Vinyals, and Q. V. V. Le. Sequence to sequence learning with neural networks. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 27, pages 3104--3112. 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. M. Theobald, J. Siddharth, and A. Paepcke. Spotsigs: Robust and efficient near duplicate detection in large web collections. In Proc. SIGIR 2008, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. W. M. Vagias. Likert-type scale response anchors. Clemson International Institute for Tourism & Research Development, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. O. Čulo and G. de Melo. Source-Path-Goal: Investigating the cross-linguistic potential of frame-semantic text analysis. it - Information Technology, 54, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. M. Walsh. The 'textual shift': examining the reading process with print, visual and multimodal texts. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 29(1):24--37, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Y. Wang, Z. Ren, M. Theobald, M. Dylla, and G. de Melo. Summary generation for temporal extractions. In Proc. DEXA, 2016. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. A. J. Wecker, J. Lanir, O. Mokryn, E. Minkov, and T. Kuflik. Semantize: Visualizing the sentiment of individual document. In Proc. AVI 2014, pages 385--386. ACM, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Q. Yang, R. J. Passonneau, and G. de Melo. PEAK: Pyramid evaluation via automated knowledge extraction. In Proc. AAAI. AAAI Press, 2016. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. J. S. Yi. QnDReview: Read 100 CHI papers in 7 hours. In CHI '14 Extended Abstracts, pages 805--814. ACM, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. K. X. Yong, K. Rajdev, T. J. Shakespeare, A. P. Leff, and S. J. Crutch. Facilitating text reading in posterior cortical atrophy. Neurology, 85(4):339--348, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Y. Zhu, R. Kiros, R. S. Zemel, R. Salakhutdinov, R. Urtasun, A. Torralba, and S. Fidler. Aligning books and movies: Towards story-like visual explanations by watching movies and reading books. CoRR, abs/1506.06724, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. HiText: Text Reading with Dynamic Salience Marking

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        WWW '17 Companion: Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web Companion
        April 2017
        1738 pages
        ISBN:9781450349147

        Publisher

        International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee

        Republic and Canton of Geneva, Switzerland

        Publication History

        • Published: 3 April 2017

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        WWW '17 Companion Paper Acceptance Rate164of966submissions,17%Overall Acceptance Rate1,899of8,196submissions,23%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader