ABSTRACT
In this paper, we perform an econometric analysis on the benefits of introducing flexibility in the Danish/Nordic regulating power market. The paper investigates the relationships between market power prices and regulation volumes, in order to quantify the effects of flexibility on regulating power prices. Further, we analyze the benefit for various types of flexibility and market objectives, to detect the type of energy flexibility that maximizes the benefits. Results show that if 3.87% of total demand is flexible, the market can reduce the regulation cost by 49% and the regulation volume by 29.4%.
- The MIRABEL project, 2013. http://www.mirabel-project.eu.Google Scholar
- The TotalFlex project, 2014. http://www.totalflex.dk/Forside/.Google Scholar
- G. Bathurst, J. Weatherill, and G. Strbac. Trading wind generation in short term energy markets. Power Systems, IEEE Transactions on, pages 782--789, 2002.Google Scholar
- T. Bigler, G. Gaderer, P. Loschmidt, and T. Sauter. Smartfridge: Demand side management for the device level. In ETFA 2011, pages 1--8, 2011.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Fabbri, T. Román, J. Abbad, and V. Quezada. Assessment of the cost associated with wind generation prediction errors in a liberalized electricity market. Power Systems, IEEE Transactions on, pages 1440--1446, 2005.Google Scholar
- A. M. Foley, P. G. Leahy, A. Marvuglia, and E. J. McKeogh. Current methods and advances in forecasting of wind power generation. Renewable Energy, pages 1--8, 2012.Google Scholar
- A. Giannitrapani, S. Paoletti, A. Vicino, and D. Zarrilli. Bidding strategies for renewable energy generation with non stationary statistics. In World Congress, pages 10784--10789, 2014.Google ScholarCross Ref
- I. Ilieva and T. F. Bolkesjø. An econometric analysis of the regulation power market at the nordic power exchange. Energy Procedia, pages 58--64, 2014.Google ScholarCross Ref
- O. Lünsdorf and M. Sonnenschein. A pooling based load shift strategy for household appliances. In EnviroInfo 2010, pages 734--743, 2010.Google Scholar
- B. Neupane, T. Pedersen, and B. Thiesson. Towards flexibility detection in device-level energy consumption. In Proceedings of the Second ECML/PKDD Workshop, DARE'14, pages 1--16. 2014.Google ScholarDigital Library
- N. E. R. (NordREG). Nordic market report 2014.Google Scholar
- K. Skytte. The regulating power market on the Nordic power exchange Nord Pool: an econometric analysis. Energy Economics, pages 295--308, 1999.Google Scholar
- L.Šikşnys, M. Khalefa, and T. Pedersen. Aggregating and disaggregating flexibility objects. In SSDBM 2012, pages 379--396. 2012. Google ScholarDigital Library
- X. Wang, P. Guo, and X. Huang. A review of wind power forecasting models. Energy Procedia, pages 770--778, 2011.Google ScholarCross Ref
- X. Zhang. Optimal wind bidding strategy considering imbalance cost and allowed imbalance band. In Energytech, 2012 IEEE, pages 1--5, 2012.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Evaluating the Value of Flexibility in Energy Regulation Markets
Recommendations
Resource Flexibility and Capital Structure
This paper examines how the optimal investment in the capacity of flexible and nonflexible resources is affected by financial leverage and, conversely, how a firm's resource flexibility affects its optimal capital structure. We consider a two-product ...
Operational Flexibility and Financial Hedging: Complements or Substitutes?
We consider a firm that invests in capacity under demand uncertainty and thus faces two related but distinct types of risk: mismatch between capacity and demand and profit variability. Whereas mismatch risk can be mitigated with greater operational ...
Stochastic Capacity Investment and Flexible vs. Dedicated Technology Choice in Imperfect Capital Markets
This paper analyzes the impact of endogenous credit terms under capital market imperfections in a capacity investment setting. We model a monopolist firm that decides on its technology choice (flexible versus dedicated) and capacity level under demand ...
Comments