Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2493988.2494333acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesubicompConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Preference, context and communities: a multi-faceted approach to predicting smartphone app usage patterns

Published:08 September 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

Reliable smartphone app prediction can strongly benefit both users and phone system performance alike. However, real-world smartphone app usage behavior is a complex phenomena driven by a number of competing factors. In this pa- per, we develop an app usage prediction model that leverages three key everyday factors that affect app usage decisions -- (1) intrinsic user app preferences and user historical patterns; (2) user activities and the environment as observed through sensor-based contextual signals; and, (3) the shared aggregate patterns of app behavior that appear in various user communities. While rapid progress has been made recently in smartphone app prediction, existing prediction models tend to focus on only one of these factors. We evaluate a multi-faceted approach to prediction using (1) a 3-week 35-user field trial, along with (2) analysis of app usage logs of 4,606 smartphone users worldwide. We find our app usage model can not only produce more robust app predictions than conventional techniques, but it can also enable significant smartphone system optimizations.

References

  1. MTA Subway Time. http://apps.mta.info/traintime/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Runkeeper. http://runkeeper.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. R. Bridle and E. McCreath., Predictive Menu Selection on a Mobile Phone, In ECML'05. pp.75--88, 2005Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. C. Shin, J.-H. Hong, A. Dey., Understanding and Prediction of Mobile Application Usage for Smart Phones, In Ubicomp'12. pp.173--182, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. 5. C. Yoon, et al., AppScope: Application Energy Metering Framework for Android Smartphone Using Kernel Activity Monitoring, In ATC'12. pp.1--14, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. T. Yan et al., Fast App Launching for Mobile Devices using Predictive User Context, In MobiSys'12. pp.113--126, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. K. Shi and K. Ali., GetJar mobile application recommendations with very sparse datasets, In KDD'12. pp.204--212, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. D. Peebles, et al., Community-guided learning: Exploiting mobile sensor users to model human behavior, In AAAI'10. pp.1600--1606, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. H. Lu et al., The Jigsaw continuous sensing engine for mobile phone applications, In Sensys'10. pp.71--84, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. B. Yan and G. Chen., AppJoy: personalized mobile application discovery, In MobiSys'11. pp.113--126, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. J. Shawe-Taylor and N. Cristianini., Kernel Methods for Pattern Analysis, Cambridge Press, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. W. Ping, et al., FAMER: Making Multi-Instance Learning Better and Faster, In SDM'11. pp. 594--605, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Y. Xu, et al., Multi-instance Metric Learning, In ICDM'11. pp.874--883, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. S. Lyu., Mercer kernels for object recognition with local features, In CVPR'05. pp.223--229, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. J. T. Kwok and P.-M. Cheung., Marginalized multi-instance kernels, In IJCAI'07. pp.901--906, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. J. Shao., Mathematical statistics, New York Springer-Verlag, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. C. M. Bishop., Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning, Springer, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. W. Pan, N. Aharony and A. Pentland., Composite Social Network for Predicting Mobile Apps Installation, In AAAI'11. pp.821--827, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. H. Verkasalo., Contextual patterns in mobile service usage, PUC, 13(5):331--342, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. A. Woznica and A. Kalousis., Adaptive distances on sets of vectors, In ICDM'10. pp.579--588, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. B. Matthias et al., Falling asleep with Angry Birds, Facebook and Kindle: a large scale study on mobile application usage, In MobileHCI'11. pp.47--56, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. R. Ahmad et al., Exploring iPhone usage: the influence of socioeconomic differences on smartphone adoption, usage and usability, In MobileHCI'12. pp.11--20, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. T. Minh et al., Smartphone usage in the wild: a large-scale analysis of applications and context. In ICMI'11. pp.353--360, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. O. Franko and T. Tirrell., Smartphone app use among medical providers in ACGME training programs. Journal of Medical Systems, 36: pp.3135--3139, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. J. S. Breese, D. Heckerman, and C. Kadie., Empirical analysis of predictive algorithms for collaborative filtering, In UAI'98. pp.43--52, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. J. L. Herlocker et al., Evaluating collaborative filtering recommender systems. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst., 22(1):pp.5--53, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. A. Popescul, D. M. Pennock, and S. Lawrence., Probabilistic models for unified collaborative and content-based recommendation in sparse-data environments, In UAI'01. pp.437--444, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. N. Lane et al., Enabling large-scale human activity inference on smartphones using community similarity networks, In UbiComp'11. pp.355--364, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. N. Lane et al., Exploiting social networks for large-scale human behavior modeling, IEEE Pervasive Computing, 10(4):pp.45--53, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Preference, context and communities: a multi-faceted approach to predicting smartphone app usage patterns

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        ISWC '13: Proceedings of the 2013 International Symposium on Wearable Computers
        September 2013
        160 pages
        ISBN:9781450321273
        DOI:10.1145/2493988

        Copyright © 2013 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 8 September 2013

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        ISWC '13 Paper Acceptance Rate20of101submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate38of196submissions,19%

        Upcoming Conference

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader