Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2361407.2361428acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesih-n-mmsecConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A methodological framework for investigating age factors on the performance of biometric systems

Authors Info & Claims
Published:06 September 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

Any individual's biometric data are likely to change with the passage of time and, as a result, developing biometric applications for long-term use is a challenging task. One of the factors which increases the challenge of dealing with ageing effects in biometric systems is that the age of an individual is a continuous variable, and it is impossible to investigate and understand ageing issues in biometric systems other than using discrete age "bands". However, this division of a given population into age-bands has generally been a rather arbitrary exercise, making it difficult to optimise or compare results in different studies. In this paper, we will investigate, document and analyse the effects of age-band assignment, improving our understanding of how to manage age-related data and pointing to the possibility of more objectively determining optimal age-bands which offer a greater possibility of minimizing the sensitivity of a system which relies on such information. We study specifically the iris (physiological) and signature (behavioural) modalities.

References

  1. Fairhurst, M. C. and Abreu, M. 2009. An Investigation of Predictive Profiling from Handwritten Signature Data. 4th International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (2009). ICDAR '09. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Xin, G., Zhi-Hua, Z. and Smith-Miles, K. 2007. Automatic Age Estimation Based on Facial Aging Patterns. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 29, 12 (2007), 2234--2240. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Guodong, G., Yun, F., Dyer, C. R. and Huang, T. S. 2008. Image-Based Human Age Estimation by Manifold Learning and Locally Adjusted Robust Regression. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 17, 7 (2008), 1178--1188. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Thomas, V., Chawla, N. V., Bowyer, K. W. and Flynn, P. J. 2007. Learning to predict gender from iris images. First IEEE International Conference on Biometrics: Theory, Applications, and Systems. (September 27 - 29, 2007). BTAS' 07.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Metze, F., Ajmera, J., Englert, R., Bub, U., Burkhardt, F., Stegmann, J., Muller, C., Huber, R., Andrassy, B., Bauer, J. G. and Littel, B. 2007. Comparison of Four Approaches to Age and Gender Recognition for Telephone Applications. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing. (April 15-20, 2007). ICASSP 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Hosoi, S., Takikawa, E. and Kawade, M. 2004. Ethnicity estimation with facial images. In proceedings of the sixth IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition. (May 17-19, 2004). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Guodong, G. and Guowang, M. 2010. A study of large-scale ethnicity estimation with gender and age variations. IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops. (June 13-18, 2010). CVPRW 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Fairhurst, M. and Erbilek, M. 2011. Analysis of physical ageing effects in iris biometrics. Computer Vision, IET, 5, 6 (2011), 358--366.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Guest, R. 2006. Age dependency in handwritten dynamic signature verification systems. Pattern Recognition Letters, 27, 10 (2006), 1098--1104. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Chapran, J., Fairhurst, M. C., Guest, R. M. and Ujam, C. 2008. Task-related population characteristics in handwriting analysis. Computer Vision, IET, 2, 2 (2008), 75--87.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Abreu, M. and Fairhurst, M. 2008. Analyzing the impact of non-biometric information on multiclassifier processing for signature recognition applications. 2nd IEEE International Conference on Biometrics: Theory, Applications and Systems. (2008). BTAS' 08.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Modi, S. K., Elliott, S. J., Whetsone, J. and Hakil, K. 2007. Impact of Age Groups on Fingerprint Recognition Performance. IEEE Workshop on Automatic Identification Advanced Technologies. (2007).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Jr., K. R. and Tesafaye, T. 2006. MORPH: A Longitudinal Image Database of Normal Adult Age-Progression. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition. (2006). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Singh, R., Vatsa, M., Noore, A. and Singh, S. 2007. Age Transformation for Improving Face Recognition Performance. In Pattern Recognition and Machine Intelligence, Ghosh, A., De, R. and Pal, S., Ed. Springer Berlin/Heidelberg, 576--583. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Ho, W., Watters, P. and Verity, D. 2007. Are Younger People More Difficult to Identify or Just a Peer-to-Peer Effect. In Computer Analysis of Images and Patterns, Kropatsch, W., Kampel, M. and Hanbury, A., Ed. Springer Berlin/Heidelberg, 351--359. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Yui Man, L., Bolme, D., Draper, B. A., Beveridge, J. R., Givens, G. and Phillips, P. J. 2009. A meta-analysis of face recognition covariates. 3rd IEEE International Conference on Biometrics: Theory, Applications and Systems. (2009). BTAS' 09. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Ortega-Garcia, J., Alonso-Fernandez, F., Fierrez-Aguilar, J., Garcia-Mateo, C., Salicetti, S., Allano, L., Ly-Van, B. and Dorizzi, B. 2006. Software tool and acquisition equipment recommendations for the three scenarios considered. Technical Report No. D6.2.1., Contract No. IST-2002-507634.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Ye, S., Jian-Ming, Z., Liang-Min, W., Yong-Zhao, Z. and Shun-Lin, S. 2005. A novel method of recognizing ageing face based on EHMM. In proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics. (August 18-21, 2005).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Sickler, N. C. and Elliott, S. J. 2005. An evaluation of fingerprint image quality across an elderly population vis-a-vis an 18--25 year old population. 39th Annual International Carnahan Conference on Security Technology. (2005). CCST '05.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Erbilek, M. and Fairhurst, M. 2012. A framework for managing ageing effects in signature biometrics. Biometrics, IET (2012). (Accepted for publication).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Erbilek, M. and Fairhurst, M. 2011. Evaluating Iris Segmentation for Scenario Optimisation. In 4th International Conference on Imaging for Crime Detection and Prevention. (November 3-4 2011). ICDP' 12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Masek, L. and Kovesi, P. 2003. MATLAB Source Code for a Biometric Identification System Based on Iris Patterns.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Abreu, M. and Fairhurst, M. 2009. Improving Identity Prediction in Signature-based Unimodal Systems Using Soft Biometrics. In Biometric ID Management and Multimodal Communication, Fierrez, J., Ortega-Garcia, J., Esposito, A., Drygajlo, A., Faundez-Zanuy, M., Ed. Springer Berlin / Heidelberg, 348--356. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Lee, L. L., Berger, T. and Aviczer, E. 1996. Reliable online human signature verification systems. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, IEEE Transactions on, 18, 6 (1996), 643--647. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Lei, H. and Govindaraju, V. 2005. A comparative study on the consistency of features in on-line signature verification. Pattern Recognition Letters, 26, 15 (2005), 2483--2489. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Spearman, C. 1904. The Proof and Measurement of Association between Two Things. The American journal of psychology, 15 (1904), 72--101.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A methodological framework for investigating age factors on the performance of biometric systems

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      MM&Sec '12: Proceedings of the on Multimedia and security
      September 2012
      184 pages
      ISBN:9781450314176
      DOI:10.1145/2361407

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 6 September 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate128of318submissions,40%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader