Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2342356.2342427acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescommConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Free Access

Abstractions for network update

Published:13 August 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

Configuration changes are a common source of instability in networks, leading to outages, performance disruptions, and security vulnerabilities. Even when the initial and final configurations are correct, the update process itself often steps through intermediate configurations that exhibit incorrect behaviors. This paper introduces the notion of consistent network updates---updates that are guaranteed to preserve well-defined behaviors when transitioning mbetween configurations. We identify two distinct consistency levels, per-packet and per-flow, and we present general mechanisms for implementing them in Software-Defined Networks using switch APIs like OpenFlow. We develop a formal model of OpenFlow networks, and prove that consistent updates preserve a large class of properties. We describe our prototype implementation, including several optimizations that reduce the overhead required to perform consistent updates. We present a verification tool that leverages consistent updates to significantly reduce the complexity of checking the correctness of network control software. Finally, we describe the results of some simple experiments demonstrating the effectiveness of these optimizations on example applications.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

sigcomm-vii-02-abstractionsfornetworkupdate.mp4

mp4

86.7 MB

References

  1. P. Francois and O. Bonaventure, "Avoiding transient loops during the convergence of link-state routing protocols," IEEE/ACM Trans. on Networking, Dec 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. P. Francois, P.-A. Coste, B. Decraene, and O. Bonaventure, "Avoiding disruptions during maintenance operations on BGP sessions," IEEE Trans. on Network and Service Management, Dec 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. S. Raza, Y. Zhu, and C.-N. Chuah, "Graceful network state migrations," IEEE/ACM Trans. on Networking, vol. 19, Aug 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. D. Erickson et al., "A demonstration of virtual machine mobility in an OpenFlow network," Aug 2008. Demo at ACM SIGCOMM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. L. Vanbever, S. Vissicchio, C. Pelsser, P. Francois, and O. Bonaventure, "Seamless network-wide IGP migration," in ACM SIGCOMM, Aug 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. N. Handigol, S. Seetharaman, M. Flajslik, N. McKeown, and R. Johari, "Plug-n-Serve: Load-balancing web traffic using OpenFlow," Aug 2009. Demo at ACM SIGCOMM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. R. Wang, D. Butnariu, and J. Rexford, "OpenFlow-based server load balancing gone wild," in Hot-ICE, Mar 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. P. Francois, M. Shand, and O. Bonaventure, "Disruption-free topology reconfiguration in OSPF networks," in IEEE INFOCOM, May 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. J. P. John, E. Katz-Bassett, A. Krishnamurthy, T. Anderson, and A. Venkataramani, "Consensus routing: The Internet as a distributed system," in NSDI, Apr 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. N. McKeown, T. Anderson, H. Balakrishnan, G. Parulkar, L. Peterson, J. Rexford, S. Shenker, and J. Turner, "Openflow: Enabling innovation in campus networks," SIGCOMM CCR, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 69--74, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. M. Canini, D. Venzano, P. Peresini, D. Kostic, and J. Rexford, "A NICE way to test OpenFlow applications," in NSDI, Apr 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Y. Bertot and P. Casteran, "Interactive theorem proving and program development: Coq'Art the calculus of inductive constructions," in EATCS Texts in Theoretical Computer Science, Springer-Verlag, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. A. Cimatti, E. Clarke, E. Giunchiglia, F. Giunchiglia, M. Pistore, M. Roveri, R. Sebastiani, and A. Tacchella, "NuSMV 2: An opensource tool for symbolic model checking," pp. 359--364, Springer, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. P. Kazemian, G. Varghese, and N. McKeown, "Header space analysis: Static checking for networks," in NSDI, Apr 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. E. M. Clarke, E. A. Emerson, and A. P. Sistla, "Automatic verification of finite-state concurrent systems using temporal logic specifications," ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems, vol. 8, pp. 244--263, 1986. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. B. M. Waxman, "Broadband switching," ch. Routing of Multipoint Connections, pp. 347--352, IEEE Computer Society Press, 1991. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. J. Mogul, J. Tourrilhes, P. Yalagandula, P. Sharma, A. Curtis, and S. Banerjee, "DevoFlow: Scaling flow management for high-performance networks," in ACM SIGCOMM, Aug 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. N. Gude, T. Koponen, J. Pettit, B. Pfaff, M. Casado, N. McKeown, and S. Shenker, "NOX: Towards an operating system for networks," SIGCOMM CCR, vol. 38, no. 3, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. B. Lantz, B. Heller, and N. McKeown, "A network in a laptop: Rapid prototyping for software-defined networks," in HotNets, Oct 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. M. Reitblatt, N. Foster, J. Rexford, and D. Walker, "Consistent updates for software-defined networks: Change you can believe in!," in HotNets, Nov 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. D. Katabi, N. Kushman, and J. Wrocklawski, "A Consistency Management Layer for Inter-Domain Routing," Tech. Rep. MIT-CSAIL-TR-2006-006, Cambridge, MA, Jan 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. S. Ajmani, B. Liskov, and L. Shrira, "Modular software upgrades for distributed systems," in Proceedings of the 20th European conference on Object-Oriented Programming, ECOOP'06, (Berlin, Heidelberg), pp. 452--476, Springer-Verlag, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. C. C. Zhang, M. Winslett, and C. A. Gunter, "On the safety and efficiency of firewall policy deployment," in IEEE Symp. on Security and Privacy, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. N. Feamster and H. Balakrishnan, "Detecting BGP configuration faults with static analysis," in NSDI, May 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Abstractions for network update

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SIGCOMM '12: Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2012 conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communication
        August 2012
        474 pages
        ISBN:9781450314190
        DOI:10.1145/2342356

        Copyright © 2012 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 13 August 2012

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate554of3,547submissions,16%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader