Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/984622.984624acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescpsweekConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Distributed regression: an efficient framework for modeling sensor network data

Published:26 April 2004Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present distributed regression, an efficient and general framework for in-network modeling of sensor data. In this framework, the nodes of the sensor network collaborate to optimally fit a global function to each of their local measurements. The algorithm is based upon kernel linear regression, where the model takes the form of a weighted sum of local basis functions; this provides an expressive yet tractable class of models for sensor network data. Rather than transmitting data to one another or outside the network, nodes communicate constraints on the model parameters, drastically reducing the communication required. After the algorithm is run, each node can answer queries for its local region, or the nodes can efficiently transmit the parameters of the model to a user outside the network. We present an evaluation of the algorithm based upon data from a 48-node sensor network deployment at the Intel Research - Berkeley Lab, demonstrating that our distributed algorithm converges to the optimal solution at a fast rate and is very robust to packet losses.

References

  1. U. Bertele and F. Brioschi. Nonserial Dynamic Programming. Academic Press, New York, 1972. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. R. Cowell, P. Dawid, S. Lauritzen, and D. Spiegelhalter. Probabilistic Networks and Expert Systems. Spinger, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. G. Golub and C. Van Loan. Matrix Computations. Johns Hopkins, 1989.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. J. Hill, R. Szewczyk, A. Woo, S. Hollar, D. Culler, and K. Pister. System architecture directions for networked sensors. In Proceedings of ASPLOS, pages 93--104, November 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. C. Intanagonwiwat, D. Estrin, R. Govindan, and J.Heidemann. Impact of network density on data aggregation in wireless sensor networks. In ICDCS, July 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. C. Intanagonwiwat, R. Govindan, and D. Estrin. Directed diffusion: A scalable and robust communication paradigm for sensor networks. In MobiCom, August 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. P. Levis, N. Lee, A. Woo, M. Welsh, and D. Culler. TOSSIM: Accurate and scalable simulation of entire tinyos applications. In SenSys, November 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. S. Madden. The Design and Evaluation of a Query Processing Architecture for Sensor Networks. PhD thesis, UC Berkeley, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. M. Hamilton et al. Habitat sensing array, first year report. http://cens.ucla.edu/Research/Applications/habitat_sensing.htm, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. P. McCullagh and J. Nelder. Generalized linear models. Chapman and Hall, 1983.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. A. Mainwaring, J. Polastre, R. Szewczyk, D. Culler, and J. Anderson. Wireless sensor networks for habitat monitoring. Technical Report IRB-TR-02-006, Intel Research, June 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. R. Nowak and U. Mitra. Boundary estimation in sensor networks: Theory and methods. In IPSN, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. M. Paskin and C. Guestrin. Distributed inference in sensor networks. Technical Report IRB-TR-03-039, Intel Research, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. M. Paskin and G. Lawrence. Junction tree algorithms for solving sparse linear systems. Technical Report UCB/CSD-03-1271, U.C. Berkeley, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. G. Pottie and W. Kaiser. Wireless integrated network sen-sors. Communications of the ACM, 43(5):51--58, May 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. N. Priyantha, A. Miu, H. Balakrishnan, and S. Teller. The Cricket Compass for context-aware mobile applications. In Proceedings of ACM MOBICOM, Rome, Italy, July 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. S. Ratnasamy, B. Karp, L. Yin, F. Yu, D. Estrin, R. Govindan, and S. Shenker. Ght: A geographic hash table for data-centric storage in sensornets, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Y. Yao and J. Gehrke. Query processing in sensor networks. In CIDR, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Distributed regression: an efficient framework for modeling sensor network data

                      Recommendations

                      Comments

                      Login options

                      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

                      Sign in
                      • Published in

                        cover image ACM Conferences
                        IPSN '04: Proceedings of the 3rd international symposium on Information processing in sensor networks
                        April 2004
                        464 pages
                        ISBN:1581138466
                        DOI:10.1145/984622

                        Copyright © 2004 ACM

                        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                        Publisher

                        Association for Computing Machinery

                        New York, NY, United States

                        Publication History

                        • Published: 26 April 2004

                        Permissions

                        Request permissions about this article.

                        Request Permissions

                        Check for updates

                        Qualifiers

                        • Article

                        Acceptance Rates

                        Overall Acceptance Rate143of593submissions,24%

                      PDF Format

                      View or Download as a PDF file.

                      PDF

                      eReader

                      View online with eReader.

                      eReader