Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Modeling on quicksand: dealing with the scarcity of ground truth in interdomain routing data

Published:16 January 2012Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Researchers studying the interdomain routing system, its properties and new protocols, face many challenges in performing realistic evaluations and simulations. Modeling decisions with respect to AS-level topology, routing policies and traffic matrices are complicated by a scarcity of ground truth for each of these components. Moreover, scalability issues arise when attempting to simulate over large (although still incomplete) empirically-derived AS-level topologies. In this paper, we discuss our approach for analyzing the robustness of our results to incomplete empirical data. We do this by (1) developing fast simulation algorithms that enable us to (2) running multiple simulations with varied parameters that test the sensitivity of our research results.

References

  1. B. Augustin, B. Krishnamurthy, and W. Willinger. IXPs: Mapped? In IMC, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. I. Avramopoulos, M. Suchara, and J. Rexford. How small groups can secure interdomain routing. Technical report, Princeton University Comp. Sci., 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. H. Chang, D. Dash, A. Perrig, and H. Zhang. Modeling adoptability of secure BGP protocol. In Sigcomm, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. H. Chang, S. Jamin, Z. Mao, and W. Willinger. An empirical approach to modeling inter-AS traffic matrices. In IMC, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Y.-J. Chi, R. Oliveira, and L. Zhang. Cyclops: The Internet AS-level observatory. ACM SIGCOMM CCR, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. X. Dimitropoulos, D. Krioukov, M. Fomenkov, B. Huffaker, Y. Hyun, and kc claffy. AS relationships: Inference and validation. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, JAN 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. X. Dimitropoulos and G. Riley. Efficient large-scale BGP simulations. Elsevier Computer Networks, Special Issue on Network Modeling and Simulation, 50(12), 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. N. Feamster, J. Winick, and J. Rexford. A model of BGP routing for network engineering. In SIGMETRICS, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. L. Gao and J. Rexford. Stable Internet routing without global coordination. Trans. on Networking, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. P. Gill, M. Schapira, and S. Goldberg. Let the market drive deployment: A strategy for transitioning to BGP security. In SIGCOMM, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. P. Gill, M. Schapira, and S. Goldberg. Let the market drive deployment: A strategy for transitioning to BGP security. Full version. Technical report, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. S. Goldberg, M. Schapira, P. Hummon, and J. Rexford. How secure are secure interdomain routing protocols. In Sigcomm, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. T. Griffin, F. B. Shepherd, and G. Wilfong. The stable paths problem and interdomain routing. Trans. on Networking, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. C. Jin, Q. Chen, and S. Jamin. Inet: Internet topology generator. Technical report, UM, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. J. John, E. Katz-Bassett, A. Krishnamurthy, T. Anderson, and A. Venkataramani. Consensus routing: The Internet as a distributed system. In NSDI, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. J. Karlin, S. Forrest, and J. Rexford. Autonomous security for autonomous systems. Computer Networks, oct 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. J. Karlin, S. Forrest, and J. Rexford. Nation-state routing: Censorship, wiretapping, and BGP. CoRR, abs/0903.3218, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. B. Krishnamurthy, W. Willinger, P. Gill, and M. Arlitt. A socratic method for validation of measurement-based networking research. Computer Communications, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. V. Krishnamurthy, M. Faloutsos, M. Chrobak, L. Lao, J.-H. Cui, and A. G. Percus. Sampling large Internet topologies for simulation purposes. Computer Networks (Elsevier), 51(15):4284--4302, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. C. Labovitz. Arbor blog: Battle of the hyper giants. http://asert.arbornetworks.com/2010/04/ the-battle-of-the-hyper-giants-part-i-2/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. C. Labovitz, S. Iekel-Johnson, D. McPherson, J. Oberheide, and F. Jahanian. Internet inter-domain traffic. In Sigcomm, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. A. Medina, A. Lakhina, I. Matta, and J. Byers. BRITE: an approach to universal topology generation. In MASCOTS, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. R. Oliveira, D. Pei, W. Willinger, B. Zhang, and L. Zhang. In search of the elusive ground truth: The Internet's AS-level connectivity structure. In SIGMETRICS, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. R. Oliveira, D. Pei, W. Willinger, B. Zhang, and L. Zhang. Quantifying the completeness of the observed Internet AS-level structure. UCLA Computer Science Department - Techical Report TR-080026-2008, Sept 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. F. Orbit. http://www.fixedorbit.com/metrics.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. B. J. Premore. An analysis of convergence properties of the border gateway protocol usingdiscrete event simulation. PhD thesis, Dartmouth College, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. B. Quoitin and S. Uhlig. Modeling the routing of an autonomous system with CBGP. IEEE Network Magazine, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. M. Roughan, W. Willinger, O. Maennel, D. Perouli, and R. Bush. 10 lessons from 10 years of measuring and modeling the Internet's autonomous systems. Journal on Select Areas in Communications, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Sandvine. Fall 2010 global Internet phenomena, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. W. Willinger, D. Alderson, and J. Doyle. Mathematics and the Internet: A source of enourmous confusion and great potential. Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. M. Wojciechowski. Border gateway protocol modeling and simulation. Master's thesis, University of Warsaw, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. J. Wu, Y. Zhang, Z. M. Mao, and K. Shin. Internet routing resilience to failures: Analysis and implications. In CoNEXT, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Y. Yu, M. Isard, D. Fetterly, M. Budiu, U. Erlingsson, P. K. Gunda, and J. Currey. Dryadlinq: a system for general-purpose distributed data-parallel computing using a high-level language. In Usenix OSDI, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. E. Zegura, K. Calvert, and S. Bhattarcharjee. How to model an internetwork. In Infocom, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Modeling on quicksand: dealing with the scarcity of ground truth in interdomain routing data

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review
      ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review  Volume 42, Issue 1
      January 2012
      88 pages
      ISSN:0146-4833
      DOI:10.1145/2096149
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2012 Authors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 16 January 2012

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader