Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Energy minimization by dynamic base station switching in heterogeneous cellular network

Authors Info & Claims
Published:21 October 2022Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Abstract

5G communication technologies are expected to provide high rate and low delay services. To meet the requirements, more base stations (BS), including macrocell BS (MacBS) and microcell BS (MicBS), have to be deployed. In this dense multi-tier heterogeneous networks, the user quality of service (QoS) can be significantly improved by shortening communication distance between base stations and users. However, the network energy consumptions of base stations have been growing quickly. How to save energy consumption in these dense layered network has become a problem we have to face. In this paper, we proposed a microcell BS (MicBS) switch algorithm to reduce the network energy consumption. The BS energy consumption is associated with traffic load, which is denoted as the number of users a BS serves. Considering the time-varying traffic load, we proposed a metric named coverage ratio to characterize how many users can enjoy the services. When the coverage ratio exceeds the upper threshold, a switch off algorithm is activated. MicBSs whose energy costs are higher than their economic profit will be switched off one by one. On the contrary, if this metric is below the lower threshold, a switch on algorithm is activated. A group of inactive MicBSs surrounded by multiple unserved users will be switched on simultaneously. After the switching operations, the network coverage ratio is expected to fall between the upper and lower bounds. Simulation results show that the coverage ratio is kept with the desired level. Compared to some existing algorithms, the proposed algorithm shows more flexible switching operation and more effective energy saving.

References

  1. 1. Zhang HLiu HCheng JLeung VCMDownlink energy efficiency of power allocation and wireless backhaul bandwidth allocation in heterogeneous small cell networksIEEE Transactions on Communications20186641705171610.1109/TCOMM.2017.2763623Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. 2. Liu ZGao LLiu YGuan XMa KWang YEfficient QoS support for robust resource allocation in blockchain-based femtocell networksIEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics202016117070708010.1109/TII.2019.2939146Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 3. Auer, G., Blume, O., Giannini, V., Godor, I., Imran, M., Jading, Y., Katranaras, E., Olsson, M., Sabella, D., & Skillermark , P. et al. (2010). D2.3: energy efficiency analysis of the reference systems, areas of improvements and target breakdown. INFSO-ICTB247733 EARTH (Energy Aware Radio Network Technoledge), pp. 39–49.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 4. Xu YXie HWu QHuang CYuen CRobust max-min energy efficiency for RIS-aided hetnets with distortion noisesIEEE Transactions on Communications20227021457147110.1109/TCOMM.2022.3141798Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. 5. Xu YGui GGacanin HAdachi FA survey on resource allocation for 5G heterogeneous networks: Current research, future trends, and challengesIEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials202123266869510.1109/COMST.2021.3059896Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. 6. Liu ZLiang CYuan YChan KGuan XResource allocation based on user pairing and subcarrier matching for downlink non-orthogonal multiple access networksIEEE/CAA Journal of Automatic Sinica20218367068010.1109/JAS.2021.1003886Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. 7. Zhao, C., Han, J., Ding, X., & Yang, F. (2020) A novel approach of dynamic base station switching strategy based on markov decision process for interference alignment in VANETs, Wireless Networks, pp. 1–18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. 8. Lassila PGebrehiwot EMAalto SOptimal energy-aware load balancing and base station switch-off control in 5G hetnetsComputer Networks2019159102210.1016/j.comnet.2019.05.001Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. 9. Xu YXie HLiang CYu FRRobust secure energy efficiency optimization in SWIPT-aided heterogeneous networks with a non-linear energy harvesting modelIEEE Internet of Things Journal202181914 90814 91910.1109/JIOT.2021.3072965Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. 10. Wu JZhang YZukerman MYung EKEnergy-efficient base-stations sleep-mode techniques in green cellular networks: A surveyIEEE Communications Surveys Tutorials201517280382610.1109/COMST.2015.2403395Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. 11. Peng JHong PXue KStochastic analysis of optimal base station energy saving in cellular networks with sleep modeIEEE Communications Letters201418461261510.1109/LCOMM.2014.030114.140241Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. 12. Liu ZZhu HYuan YYang YChan KYOptimization of base station density and user transmission power in multi-tier heterogeneous cellular systemsComputer Communications202016133434310.1016/j.comcom.2020.08.001Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. 13. Lee SHSohn IAffinity propagation for energy-efficient BS operations in green cellular networksIEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications20151484534454510.1109/TWC.2015.2422701Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. 14. Ben Rached NGhazzai HKadri AAlouini MA time-varied probabilistic on/off switching algorithm for cellular networksIEEE Communications Letters201822363463710.1109/LCOMM.2018.2792001Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. 15. Kim JLee HChong STraffic-aware energy-saving base station sleeping and clustering in cooperative networksIEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications20181721173118610.1109/TWC.2017.2776916Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. 16. Beitelmal TSzyszkowicz SSGonzlez DGYanikomeroglu HSector and site switch-off regular patterns for energy saving in cellular networksIEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications20181752932294510.1109/TWC.2018.2804397Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. 17. Panahi FHPanahi FHHattab GOhtsuki TCabric DGreen heterogeneous networks via an intelligent sleep/wake-up mechanism and D2D communicationsIEEE Transactions on Green Communications and Networking20182491593110.1109/TGCN.2018.2844301Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. 18. Yu NMiao YMu LDu HHuang HJia XMinimizing energy cost by dynamic switching on/off base stations in cellular networksIEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications201615117457746910.1109/TWC.2016.2602824Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. 19. Amine, A.E., Chaiban, J.P., Hassan, H.A.H., Dini, P., Nuaymi, L., & Achkar, R. (2022). Energy optimization with multi-sleeping control in 5g heterogeneous networks using reinforcement learning, IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, early access, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSM.2022.3157650.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. 20. Oh ESon KKrishnamachari BDynamic base station switching-on/off strategies for green cellular networksIEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications20131252126213610.1109/TWC.2013.032013.120494Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. 21. Ajmone Marsan, M., Chiaraviglio, L., Ciullo, D., & Meo, M. (2009) Optimal energy savings in cellular access networks, in 2009 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops, pp. 1–5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. 22. Dahal MSShrestha JNShakya SREnergy saving technique and measurement in green wireless communicationEnergy2018159213110.1016/j.energy.2018.06.066Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. 23. Tabassum HSiddique UHossain EHossain MJDownlink performance of cellular systems with base station sleeping, user association, and schedulingIEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications201413105752576710.1109/TWC.2014.2336249Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. 24. Liu ZXie YChan KGuan XChance-constrained optimization in d2d-based vehicular communication networkIEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology20196855045505810.1109/TVT.2019.2904291Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. 25. Ignacio, G., Bo, Y., Shuai, Z., & Yu, C. (2021). Optimization of base station on-off switching with a machine learning approach, in ICC 2021-IEEE International Conference on Communications, pp. 1–6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. 26. Marcin, H., Adrian, K., Pawel, K., & Koudouridis, G. P. (2020). A reinforcement learning approach for base station on/off switching in heterogeneous m-mimo networks, in 2020 IEEE 21st International Symposium on A World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks (WoWMoM), pp. 170–172.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. 27. Haenggi MStochastic geometry for wireless networks2012CambridgeCambridge Press10.1017/CBO97811390438161272.60001Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. 28. Yuanai XZhixin LYan CKXinping GEnergy-spectral efficiency optimization in vehicular communications: Joint clustering and pricing-based robust power control approachIEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology2020691113 67313 68510.1109/TVT.2020.3021478Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. 29. Andrews JGBaccelli FGanti RKA tractable approach to coverage and rate in cellular networksIEEE Transactions on Communications201159113122313410.1109/TCOMM.2011.100411.100541Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Energy minimization by dynamic base station switching in heterogeneous cellular network
              Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

              Recommendations

              Comments

              Login options

              Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

              Sign in

              Full Access

              • Published in

                cover image Wireless Networks
                Wireless Networks  Volume 29, Issue 2
                Feb 2023
                491 pages

                © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

                Publisher

                Springer-Verlag

                Berlin, Heidelberg

                Publication History

                • Published: 21 October 2022
                • Accepted: 29 September 2022

                Qualifiers

                • research-article
              • Article Metrics

                • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
                • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

                Other Metrics