Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
research-article

Zero-Interaction Security-Towards Sound Experimental Validation

Authors Info & Claims
Published:14 November 2019Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Reproducibility and realistic datasets are crucial for advancing research. Unfortunately, they are often neglected as valid scientific contributions in many young disciplines, with computer science being no exception. In this article, we show the challenges encountered when reproducing the work of others, collecting realistic data in the wild, and ensuring that our own work is reproducible in turn. The presented findings are based on our study investigating the limits of zero-interaction security (ZIS)- a novel concept, leveraging sensor data collected by Internet of Things (IoT) devices to pair or authenticate devices. In particular, we share our experiences in reproducing five state-of-the-art ZIS schemes, collecting a comprehensive dataset of sensor data from the real world, evaluating these schemes on the collected data, and releasing the data, code, and documentation to facilitate reproducibility of our results.

References

  1. Fomichev, M., Maass, M., Almon, L., Molina, A. and Hollick, M. (2019). Perils of zero-interaction security in the Internet of Things. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, 3(1). DOI:https://doi. org/10.1145/3314397.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Fomichev, M., Maass, M., Almon, L., Molina, A. and Hollick, M. (2019). A dataset for zerointeraction security systems. DOI: https://doi. org/10.5281/zenodo.2537721Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Benureau, F.C.Y. and Rougier, N.P. (2018, January). Re-run, repeat, reproduce, reuse, replicate: Transforming code into scientific contributions. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 11, 1--8. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3389/ fninf.2017.00069.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Collberg, C. and Proebsting, T.A. (2016, February). Repeatability in computer systems research. Communications of the ACM, 59(3) 62--69. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2812803.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Rawassizadeh, R. and Kotz, D. (2017, April). Datasets for mobile, wearable and IoT research. GetMobile: Mobile Computing and Communications, 20(4), 5--7. DOI:https://doi. org/10.1145/3081016.3081018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Md Faridee, A.Z., Ramamurthy, S.R. and Roy, N. (2018, September). HappyFeet: Challenges in building an automated dance recognition and assessment tool. GetMobile: Mobile Computing and Communications, 22(3), 10--16. DOI:https:// doi.org/10.1145/3308755.3308759Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Stisen, A., Blunck, H., Bhattacharya, S., Prentow, T.S., Kjærgaard, M.B., Dey, A., Sonne, T. and Jensen, M.M. (2015). Smart Devices are Different: Assessing and Mitigating Mobile Sensing Heterogeneities for Activity Recognition. ACM SenSys., 127--140. DOI:https://doi. org/10.1145/2809695.2809718Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in

Full Access

  • Published in

    cover image GetMobile: Mobile Computing and Communications
    GetMobile: Mobile Computing and Communications  Volume 23, Issue 2
    June 2019
    34 pages
    ISSN:2375-0529
    EISSN:2375-0537
    DOI:10.1145/3372300
    Issue’s Table of Contents

    Copyright © 2019 Copyright is held by the owner/author(s)

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 14 November 2019

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)9
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader