Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3437120.3437346acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Resource Provisioning Schemes for Multiple Workflow Scheduling with Seclusion Requirements

Published:04 March 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

In the generic statement of the workflow scheduling problem we are given a set of tasks that have precedence constraints and a set of available machines whereby they can be assigned. The problem is to schedule the tasks to machines so that some target function, e.g., makespan, is optimized. The workflow itself is usually modeled by means of a DAG with nodes representing tasks and edges capturing precedence requirements. In the multiple workflow version of the problem a set of workflows must be scheduled concurrently to the available machines. Most research in the area focused on using a common task queue for all workflows, while task to machine assignment exhibited no restrictions, other than the ones imposed by performance optimization criteria. Nevertheless, strong privacy requirements might entail disjoint workflow to machine assignments. In this paper we tackle the resulting resource allocation problem when multiple workflows must be executed in a secluded manner. We investigate the performance of three heuristics that decide upon the splitting of available machines to the workflows. Experimental evaluation using common benchmark DAGs reveal different trade-offs for the proposed schemes.

References

  1. Vahid Arabnejad, Kris Bubendorfer, and Bryan Ng. 2018. Budget and deadline aware e-science workflow scheduling in clouds. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems 30, 1 (2018), 29–44.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Shishir Bharathi, Ann Chervenak, Ewa Deelman, Gaurang Mehta, Mei-Hui Su, and Karan Vahi. 2008. Characterization of scientific workflows. In 2008 third workshop on workflows in support of large-scale science. IEEE, 1–10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Hamid Reza Faragardi, Mohammad Reza Saleh Sedghpour, Saber Fazliahmadi, Thomas Fahringer, and Nayereh Rasouli. 2019. GRP-HEFT: A budget-constrained resource provisioning scheme for workflow scheduling in IaaS clouds. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems 31, 6 (2019), 1239–1254.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Muhammad H Hilman, Maria A Rodriguez, and Rajkumar Buyya. 2020. Multiple Workflows Scheduling in Multi-tenant Distributed Systems: A Taxonomy and Future Directions. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 53, 1 (2020), 1–39.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Gideon Juve, Ann Chervenak, Ewa Deelman, Shishir Bharathi, Gaurang Mehta, and Karan Vahi. 2013. Characterizing and profiling scientific workflows. Future Generation Computer Systems 29, 3 (2013), 682–692.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Yu-Kwong Kwok and Ishfaq Ahmad. 1999. Static scheduling algorithms for allocating directed task graphs to multiprocessors. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 31, 4 (1999), 406–471.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Maria Alejandra Rodriguez and Rajkumar Buyya. 2017. A taxonomy and survey on scheduling algorithms for scientific workflows in IaaS cloud computing environments. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience 29, 8(2017), e4041.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Georgios L Stavrinides and Helen D Karatza. 2015. A cost-effective and qos-aware approach to scheduling real-time workflow applications in paas and saas clouds. In 2015 3rd International Conference on Future Internet of Things and Cloud. IEEE, 231–239.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Haluk Topcuoglu, Salim Hariri, and Min-you Wu. 2002. Performance-effective and low-complexity task scheduling for heterogeneous computing. IEEE transactions on parallel and distributed systems 13, 3 (2002), 260–274.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Yiping Wen, Jianxun Liu, Wanchun Dou, Xiaolong Xu, Buqing Cao, and Jinjun Chen. 2020. Scheduling workflows with privacy protection constraints for big data applications on cloud. Future Generation Computer Systems 108 (2020), 1084–1091.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Jia Yan, Suzhi Bi, Ying Jun Zhang, and Meixia Tao. 2019. Optimal task offloading and resource allocation in mobile-edge computing with inter-user task dependency. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications 19, 1(2019), 235–250.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    PCI '20: Proceedings of the 24th Pan-Hellenic Conference on Informatics
    November 2020
    433 pages

    Copyright © 2020 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 4 March 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate190of390submissions,49%
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)5
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format