Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3196494.3196502acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesasia-ccsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Detection under Privileged Information

Published:29 May 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

For well over a quarter century, detection systems have been driven by models learned from input features collected from real or simulated environments. An artifact (e.g., network event, potential malware sample, suspicious email) is deemed malicious or non-malicious based on its similarity to the learned model at runtime. However, the training of the models has been historically limited to only those features available at runtime. In this paper, we consider an alternate learning approach that trains models using privileged information--features available at training time but not at runtime--to improve the accuracy and resilience of detection systems. In particular, we adapt and extend recent advances in knowledge transfer, model influence, and distillation to enable the use of forensic or other data unavailable at runtime in a range of security domains. An empirical evaluation shows that privileged information increases precision and recall over a system with no privileged information: we observe up to 7.7% relative decrease in detection error for fast-flux bot detection, 8.6% for malware traffic detection, 7.3% for malware classification, and 16.9% for face recognition. We explore the limitations and applications of different privileged information techniques in detection systems. Such techniques provide a new means for detection systems to learn from data that would otherwise not be available at runtime.

References

  1. Mansour A. et almbox.. 2015. Novel feature extraction, selection and fusion for effective malware family classification. arXiv preprint arXiv:1511.04317.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. R. Barbosa, R. Sadre, A. Pras, and R. Meent. 2010. University of Twente traffic traces data repository University of Twente Tech Report.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. J. Bickford et almbox.. 2011. Security versus energy tradeoffs in host-based mobile malware detection Mobile systems, applications, and services.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Equifax Data Breach. 2018. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equifax. (2018). {Online; accessed 15-January-2018}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. I. Butun et almbox.. 2014. A survey of intrusion detection systems in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. A. A. Cardenas et almbox.. 2013. Big data analytics for security. IEEE System Security.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Z. B. Celik, R. Izmailov, and P. McDaniel. 2015 a. Proof and implementation of algorithmic realization of learning using privileged information (LUPI) paradigm: SVM. Technical Report NAS-TR-0187-2015. NSCR, CSE, PSU.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Z. Berkay Celik, David Lopez-Paz, and Patrick McDaniel. 2016. Patient-driven privacy control through generalized distillation. IEEE Symposium on Privacy-Aware Computing (PAC).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Z. B. Celik, P. McDaniel, and R. Izmailov. 2017. Feature cultivation in privileged information-augmented detection ACM CODASPY IWSPA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Z. Berkay Celik, Patrick McDaniel, Rauf Izmailov, Nicolas Papernot, Ryan Sheatsley, Raquel Alvarez, and Ananthram Swami. 2018. Detection under privileged information (Extended Version).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Detection under Privileged Information

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          ASIACCS '18: Proceedings of the 2018 on Asia Conference on Computer and Communications Security
          May 2018
          866 pages
          ISBN:9781450355766
          DOI:10.1145/3196494

          Copyright © 2018 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 29 May 2018

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • short-paper

          Acceptance Rates

          ASIACCS '18 Paper Acceptance Rate52of310submissions,17%Overall Acceptance Rate418of2,322submissions,18%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader