Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/3077839.3077860acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagese-energyConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Coalitional Datacenter Energy Cost Optimization in Electricity Markets

Published:16 May 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we study how datacenter energy cost can be effectively reduced in the wholesale electricity market via cooperative power procurement. Intuitively, by aggregating workloads across a group of datacenters, the overall power demand uncertainty of datacenters can be reduced, resulting in less chance of being penalized when participating in the wholesale electricity market. We use cooperative game theory to model the cooperative electricity procurement process of datacenters as a cooperative game, and show the cost saving benefits of aggregation. Then, a cost allocation scheme based on the marginal contribution of each datacenter to the total expected cost is proposed to fairly distribute the aggregation benefits among the participating datacenters. Finally, numerical experiments based on real-world traces are conducted to illustrate the benefits of aggregation compared to noncooperative power procurement.

References

  1. National Resources Defense Council. Scaling up energy efficiency across the data center industry: evaluating key drivers and barriers. Issue Paper, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. James Hamilton. Cost of power in large-scale data centers. Blog entry dated, 11:28, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Richard Brown et al. Report to congress on server and data center energy efficiency: Public law 109-431. Technical report, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Liang Yu, Tao Jiang, Yang Cao, and Qian Zhang. Risk-constrained operation for internet data centers in deregulated electricity markets. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 25(5):1306--1316, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Yuanxiong Guo, Yanmin Gong, Yuguang Fang, Pramod P Khargonekar, and Xiaojun Geng. Energy and network aware workload management for sustainable data centers with thermal storage. Parallel and Distributed Systems, IEEE Transactions on, 25(8):2030--2042, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Electric reliability council of texas. http://www.ercot.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. California iso. http://www.caiso.com/. In Green Computing Conference (IGCC), 2012 International, pages 1--10. IEEE, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Google gets go-ahead to buy, sell energy. https://www.cnet.com/news/google-gets-go-ahead-to-buy-sell-energy/, Feb. 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Mahdi Ghamkhari, Adam Wierman, and Hamed Mohsenian-Rad. Energy portfolio optimization of data centers. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2016. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Walid Saad, Zhu Han, Mérouane Debbah, Are Hjorungnes, and Tamer Basar. Coalitional game theory for communication networks. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 26(5):77--97, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. H Peyton Young. Cost allocation: methods, principles, applications. North Holland Publishing Co., 1985.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Stef H Tijs and Theo SH Driessen. Game theory and cost allocation problems. Management Science, 32(8):1015--1028, 1986. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Lloyd S Shapley. Cores of convex games. International journal of game theory, 1(1):11--26, 1971. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Lloyd S Shapley. On balanced sets and cores. Naval research logistics quarterly, 14(4):453--460, 1967.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Roger B Myerson. Game theory: analysis of conflict. Harvard University, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Guillermo Owen. Game theory. Emerald Group, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Theo SH Driessen. Cooperative games, solutions and applications, volume 3. Springer Science & Business Media, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Jayaram K Sankaran. On finding the nucleolus of an n-person cooperative game. International Journal of Game Theory, 19(4):329--338, 1991. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Zhenhua Liu, Yuan Chen, Cullen Bash, Adam Wierman, Daniel Gmach, Zhikui Wang, Manish Marwah, and Chris Hyser. Renewable and cooling aware workload management for sustainable data centers. In ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review, volume 40, pages 175--186. ACM, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Zhenhua Liu, Minghong Lin, Adam Wierman, Steven H Low, and Lachlan LH Andrew. Greening geographical load balancing. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGMETRICS joint international conference on Measurement and modeling of computer systems, pages 233--244. ACM, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Minghong Lin, Adam Wierman, Lachlan LH Andrew, and Eno Thereska. Dynamic right-sizing for power-proportional data centers. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking (TON), 21(5):1378--1391, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Qiang Wu. Making Facebook's software infrastructure more energy efficient with Autoscale.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Martin J Osborne and Ariel Rubinstein. A course in game theory. MIT press, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Mahdi Kohansal and Hamed Mohsenian-Rad. Price-maker economic bidding in two-settlement pool-based markets: The case of time-shiftable loads. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 31(1):695--705, 2016. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Eilyan Y Bitar, Ram Rajagopal, Pramod P Khargonekar, Kameshwar Poolla, and Pravin Varaiya. Bringing wind energy to market. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 27(3):1225--1235, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Enrique Baeyens, Eilyan Y Bitar, Pramod P Khargonekar, and Kameshwar Poolla. Coalitional aggregation of wind power. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 28(4):3774--3784, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Charles Reiss, John Wilkes, and Joseph L Hellerstein. Google cluster-usage traces: format+ schema. Google Inc., White Paper, pages 1--14, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Brian Guenter, Navendu Jain, and Charles Williams. Managing cost, performance, and reliability tradeoffs for energy-aware server provisioning. In INFOCOM, 2011 Proceedings IEEE, pages 1332--1340. IEEE, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Minghong Lin, Adam Wierman, Lachlan LH Andrew, and Eno Thereska. Online dynamic capacity provisioning in data centers. In Communication, Control, and Computing (Allerton), 2011 49th Annual Allerton Conference on, pages 1159--1163. IEEE, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Adam Wierman, Lachlan LH Andrew, and Ao Tang. Power-aware speed scaling in processor sharing systems. In INFOCOM 2009, IEEE, pages 2007--2015. IEEE, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Rade Stanojevic and Robert Shorten. Distributed dynamic speed scaling. In INFOCOM, 2010 Proceedings IEEE, pages 1--5. IEEE, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Lijun Chen and Na Li. On the interaction between load balancing and speed scaling. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 33(12):2567--2578, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Minghong Lin, Zhenhua Liu, Adam Wierman, and Lachlan LH Andrew. Online algorithms for geographical load balancing. In Green Computing Conference (IGCC), 2012 International, pages 1--10. IEEE, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Mohammad A Islam, Anshul Gandhi, and Shaolei Ren. Minimizing electricity cost for geo-distributed interactive services with tail latency constraint.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Ying Zhang, Lei Deng, Minghua Chen, and Peijian Wang. Joint bidding and geographic load blancing for datacenters: Is uncertainty a blessing or a curse? In INFOCOM, 2017 Proceedings IEEE. IEEE, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Cheng Wang, Bhuvan Urgaonkar, George Kesidis, Uday V Shanbhag, and Qian Wang. A case for virtualizing the electric utility in cloud data centers. In HotCloud, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Zhenhua Liu, Iris Liu, Steven Low, and Adam Wierman. Pricing data center demand response. ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review, 42(1):111--123, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Lei Rao, Xue Liu, Le Xie, and Wenyu Liu. Minimizing electricity cost: optimization of distributed internet data centers in a multi-electricity-market environment. In INFOCOM, 2010 Proceedings IEEE, pages 1--9. IEEE, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Lei Rao, Xue Liu, Le Xie, and Zhan Pang. Hedging against uncertainty: A tale of internet data center operations under smart grid environment. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2(3):555--563, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Mahdi Ghamkhari, Hamed Mohsenian-Rad, and Adam Wierman. Optimal risk-aware power procurement for data centers in day-ahead and real-time electricity markets. In Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS), 2014 IEEE Conference on, pages 610--615. IEEE, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Yuanxiong Guo, Zongrui Ding, Yuguang Fang, and Dapeng Wu. Cutting down electricity cost in internet data centers by using energy storage. In Global Telecommunications Conference (GLOBECOM 2011), 2011 IEEE, pages 1--5. IEEE, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Yuan Yao, Longbo Huang, Abhihshek Sharma, Leana Golubchik, and Michael Neely. Data centers power reduction: A two time scale approach for delay tolerant workloads. In INFOCOM, 2012 Proceedings IEEE, pages 1431--1439. IEEE, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Yuanxiong Guo and Yuguang Fang. Electricity cost saving strategy in data centers by using energy storage. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 24(6):1149--1160, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Yue Zhao, Junjie Qin, Ram Rajagopal, Andrea Goldsmith, and H Vincent Poor. Wind aggregation via risky power markets. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 30(3):1571--1581, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Dileep Kalathil, Chenye Wu, Kameshwar Poolla, and Pravin Varaiya. The sharing economy for the smart grid. arXiv preprint arXiv:1608.06990, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    e-Energy '17: Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Future Energy Systems
    May 2017
    388 pages
    ISBN:9781450350365
    DOI:10.1145/3077839

    Copyright © 2017 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 16 May 2017

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate160of446submissions,36%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader