Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
extended-abstract

Incentive design for heterogeneous user-generated content networks

Published:17 April 2014Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

This paper designs rating systems aimed at incentivizing users in UGC networks to produce content, thereby significantly improving the social welfare of such networks. We explicitly consider that monitoring user's production activities is imperfect. Such imperfect monitoring will lead to undesired rating drop of users, thereby reducing the social welfare of the network. The network topology constraint and users' heterogeneity further complicates the optimal rating system design problem since users' incentives are complexly coupled. This paper determines optimal recommendation strategies under a variety of monitoring scenarios. Our results suggest that, surprisingly, allowing a certain level of freeriding behavior may lead to higher social welfare than incentivizing all users to produce.

References

  1. A. Kittur, B. Shu, B. A. Pendleton and E. H. Chi. 2007. He says, she says: conflict and coordination in Wikipedia. SIGCHI, pp. 453--462. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. C. Dellarocas. 2005. Reputation mechanism design in online trading environments with pure moral hazard. Information Systems Research, 16(2):209--230. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Y. Zhang, J. Park, M. van der Schaar. 2013. Rating protocols for online communities. ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation (forthcoming). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. S. Kamvar, M. T. Schlosser, and H. Garcia-Molina. 2003. The eigentrust algorithm for reputation management in p2p networks. WWW 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. P. Resnick and R. Zeckhauser. 2002. Trust among strangers in internet transactions: empirical analysis of eBay's reputation system: 127--157.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. M. Kandori. 1992. Social norms and community enforcement. Review of Economic Studies, 59: 63--80.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. M. Haag and R. Lagunoff. 2006. Social norms, local interaction, and neighborhood planning. International Economic Review. 47.1: 265--296.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. omitted proof, available online http://ee.ucla.edu/¿jiexu/documents/UGC tp.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Incentive design for heterogeneous user-generated content networks

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader