Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2591971.2592021acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmetricsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Revisiting caching in content delivery networks

Published:16 June 2014Publication History

ABSTRACT

Content Delivery Networks (CDNs) differ from other caching systems in terms of both workload characteristics and performance metrics. However, there has been little prior work on large-scale measurement and characterization of content requests and caching performance in CDNs. For workload characteristics, CDNs deal with extremely large content volume, high content diversity, and strong temporal dynamics. For performance metrics, other than hit ratio, CDNs also need to minimize the disk operations and the volume of traffic from origin servers. In this paper, we conduct a large-scale measurement study to characterize the content request patterns using real-world data from a commercial CDN provider.

References

  1. V. K. Adhikari, Y. Guo, F. Hao, V. Hilt, and Z.-L. Zhang. A tale of 3 CDNs: An active measurement study of Hulu and its CDNs. In IEEE Global Internet Symposium, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. V. K. Adhikari, Y. Guo, F. Hao, M. Varvello, M. Steiner, V. Hilt, and Z.-L. Zhang. Unreeling Netflix: Understanding and improving multi-CDN movie delivery. In IEEE INFOCOM, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. M. J. Freedman. Experiences with CoralCDN: A five-year operational view. In USENIX/ACM NSDI, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. C. Huang, A. Wang, J. Li, and K. W. Ross. Measuring and evaluating large-scale CDNs: (paper withdrawn at Mirosoft's request). In ACM IMC, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. B. Krishnamurthy, C. Wills, and Y. Zhang. On the use and performance of content distribution networks. In ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Internet Measurement, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. C. Labovitz. First Data on Changing Netflix and CDN Market Share, June 2012. http://www.deepfield.net/2012/06/first-data-on-changing-netflix-and-cdn-market-share/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. M. Pathan and R. Buyya. Content Delivery Networks, Chapter 2: A Taxonomy of CDNs. Springer, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. A.-J. Su and A. Kuzmanovic. Thinning Akamai. In ACM IMC, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. S. Triukose, Z. Wen, and M. Rabinovich. Measuring a commercial content delivery network. In ACM WWW, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. P. Wendell and M. J. Freedman. Going viral: Flash crowds in an open CDN. In ACM IMC, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Revisiting caching in content delivery networks

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGMETRICS '14: The 2014 ACM international conference on Measurement and modeling of computer systems
      June 2014
      614 pages
      ISBN:9781450327893
      DOI:10.1145/2591971

      Copyright © 2014 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 16 June 2014

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • poster

      Acceptance Rates

      SIGMETRICS '14 Paper Acceptance Rate40of237submissions,17%Overall Acceptance Rate459of2,691submissions,17%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader