Farshad Kooti
ABSTRACT
The way in which social conventions emerge in communities has been of interest to social scientists for decades. Here we report on the emergence of a particular social convention on Twitter---the way to indicate a tweet is being reposted and attributing the content to its source. Despite being invented at different times and having different adoption rates, only two variations became widely adopted. In this paper we describe this process in detail, highlighting the factors that come into play in deciding which variation individuals will adopt. Our classification analysis demonstrates that the date of adoption and the number of exposures are particularly important in the adoption process, while personal features (such as the number of followers and join date) and the number of adopter friends have less discriminative power in predicting adoptions. We discuss implications of these findings in the design of future Web applications and services.
- I. Ajzen and M. Fishbein. The prediction of behavior from attitudinal and normative variables. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 6:466--487, 1970.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- S. E. Asch. Opinions and Social Pressure. Scientific American, 193:31--35, 1955.Google ScholarCross Ref
- R. Axelrod. An Evolutionary Approach to Norms. American Political Science Review, 1986.Google Scholar
- E. Bakshy, I. Rosenn, C. Marlow, and L. Adamic. The Role of Social Networks in Information Diffusion. In proc. of the International World Wide Web Conference, 2012. Google ScholarDigital Library
- F. Barth. Process and Form in Social Life. Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1981.Google Scholar
- R. Baumeister and M. Leary. The Need to Belong: Desire for Interpersonal Attachments as a Fundamental Human Motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 1995.Google ScholarCross Ref
- B. Becker and G. Mark. Social conventions in collaborative virtual environments. In proc. of the International Conference on Collaborative Virtual Environments, 1998.Google Scholar
- D. M. R. Bernardo A. Huberman and F. Wu. Social networks that matter: Twitter under the microscope. First Monday, 14(1), Jan. 2009.Google Scholar
- Bibb Latané and S. Wolf. The social impact of majorities and minorities. Psychological Review, 88:438--453, 1981.Google ScholarCross Ref
- d. boyd, S. Golder, and G. Lotan. Tweet, Tweet, Retweet: Conversational Aspects of Retweeting on Twitter. In proc. of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2010. Google ScholarDigital Library
- R. Boyd and P. J. Richerson. Why does culture increase human adaptability? Ethology and Sociobiology, 16:125--143, 1995.Google ScholarCross Ref
- B. P. Buunk and A. B. Bakker. Extradyadic sex: The role of descriptive and injunctive norms. Journal of Sex Research, 32(4):313--318, Jan. 1995.Google ScholarCross Ref
- D. Centola. The Spread of Behavior in an Online Social Network Experiment. Science, 329(5996):1194--1197, Sept. 2010.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Cha, H. Haddadi, F. Benevenuto, and K. Gummadi. Measuring User Influence in Twitter: The Million Follower Fallacy. In proc. of the International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, 2010.Google Scholar
- N. Christakis and J. H. Fowler. The Spread of Obesity in a Large Social Network over 32 Years. New England Journal of Medicine, 2007.Google ScholarCross Ref
- R. B. Cialdini. Influence: Science and practice. HarperCollins, 3 edition, 1993.Google Scholar
- R. B. Cialdini and M. R. Trost. Social Influence: Social norms, conformity, and compliance. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, and L. Gardner, editors, The Handbook of Social Psychology, pages 151--192. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1998.Google Scholar
- E. Cohen-Cole and J. M. Fletcher. Is obesity contagious? Social networks vs. environmental factors in the obesity epidemic. Journal of Health Economics, 27:1382--1387, 2008.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Delgado. Emergence of social conventions in complex networks. Artificial Intelligence, 141(1-2):171--185, 2002.{ Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Deutsch and H. B. Gerard. A study of normative and informative social influences upon individual judgment. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 51:629--636, 1955.Google ScholarCross Ref
- D. C. Feldman. The development and enforcement of group norms. The Academy of Management Review, 9(1):47--53, 1984.Google ScholarCross Ref
- L. Festinger. A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(2):117--140, 1954.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. H. Fowler and N. A. Christakis. Cooperative behavior cascades in human social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(12):5334--5338, Mar. 2010.Google ScholarCross Ref
- N. E. Friedkin. Norm Formation in Social Influence Networks. Social Networks, 23:167--189, 2001.Google ScholarCross Ref
- H. B. Gerard. The Anchorage of Opinions in Face-to-Face Groups. Human Relations, 7(3):313--325, Aug. 1954.Google ScholarCross Ref
- H. B. Gerard, R. A. Wilhelmy, and E. S. Conolley. Conformity and group size. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8:79--82, 1968.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Goyal and M. C. W. Janssen. Non-Exclusive Conventions and Social Coordination. Journal of Economic Theory, 77(1):34--57, 1997.Google ScholarCross Ref
- C. A. Insko, R. H. Smith, M. D. Alicke, J. Wade, and S. Taylor. Conformity and group size: The concern with being right and the concern with being liked. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11:41--50, 1985.Google ScholarCross Ref
- F. Kooti, H. Yang, M. Cha, K. Gummadi, and W. A. Mason. The emergence of conventions in online social networks. In proc. of the International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, 2012.Google Scholar
- J. Levine and R. L. Moreland. Progress in Small Group Research. Annual Reviews in Psychology, 41:585--634, 1990.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Milgram, L. Bickman, and L. Berkowitz. Note on the drawing power of crowds of different size. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13(2):79--82, 1969.Google ScholarCross Ref
- T. M. Newcomb. Personality and social change. Dryden, 1943.Google Scholar
- K.-D. Opp. How do norms emerge? An outline of a theory. Mind & Society, 3(2):101--128, 2001.Google ScholarCross Ref
- E. Ostrom. Collective Action and the Evolution of Social Norms. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14:137--158, 2000.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Pennacchiotti and A.-M. Popescu. Democrats, Republicans and Starbucks Afficionados: User Classification in Twitter. In proc. of the ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2011. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Riley and P. J. Burke. Identities and Self-Verification in the Small Group. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58(2):61--73, 1995.Google Scholar
- E. M. Rogers. Diffusion of Innovations. Free Press, 1983.Google Scholar
- D. M. Romero, B. Meeder, and J. Kleinberg. Differences in the Mechanics of Information Diffusion Across Topics: Idioms, Political Hashtags, and Complex Contagion on Twitter. In proc. of the International World Wide Web Conference, 2011. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Salganik, P. S. Dodds, and D. J. Watts. Experimental Study of Inequality and Unpredictability in an Artificial Cultural Market. Science, 311:854--856, 2006..Google ScholarCross Ref
- B. Savarimuthu, S. Cranefield, and M. Purvis. Role Model Based Mechanism for Norm Emergence in Artificial Agent Societies. In proc. of the AAMAS'07 Workshop on Coordination, Organization, Institutions and Norms in Agent Systems, 2007. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Sherif. The psychology of social norms. Harper, 1936.Google Scholar
- Y. Shoham and M. Tennenholtz. On the emergence of social conventions: modeling, analysis, and simulations. Artificial Intelligence, 94(1-2):139--166, 1997. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. M. Taylor and W. Louis. Terrorism and the quest for identity. In F. M. Moghaddam and A. J. Marsella, editors, Understanding terrorism: Psychosocial roots, consequences, and interventions, volume 343, pages 169--185. American Psychological Association, 2004.Google Scholar
- A. Walker and M. Wooldridge. Understanding the emergence of conventions in multi-agent systems. In proc. of the International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems, 1995.Google Scholar
- WEKA website. http://www.cs.waikato.ac.nz/ml/weka.Google Scholar
- D. Wilkes-Gibbs and H. Clark. Coordinating beliefs in conversation. Journal of Memory and Language, 31(2):183--194, 1992.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. P. Zanna and J. M. Olson. Individual differences in attitudinal relations. In M. P. Zanna, E. T. Higgins, and C. P. Herman, editors, Consistency in social behavior: The Ontario Symposium, volume 2, pages 75--103. Erlbaum, 1982.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Predicting emerging social conventions in online social networks
Recommendations
The interplay between users' intraorganizational social media use and social capital
Divide the use of intraorganizational social media into social and work related use.Investigate the impact of social related use on work related use via social capital.Demonstrate the value of social activities on improving work related social media use ...
Branding with social media
The emergence of social media provides a new platform for developing brand-consumer relationships. The aim of the current study is to examine the differences in Chinese users' gratifications of different social media and the impact of brand content ...
Analyzing and predicting viral tweets
WWW '13 Companion: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide WebTwitter and other microblogging services have become indispensable sources of information in today's web. Understanding the main factors that make certain pieces of information spread quickly in these platforms can be decisive for the analysis of ...
Comments