Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
skip to main content
10.1145/2396636.2396710acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesissConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

uEmergency: a collaborative system for emergency management on very large tabletop

Authors Info & Claims
Published:11 November 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

The vertical display, indirect input and distant communication in traditional Emergency Management Information System provide unintuitive human-computer-interaction, and thus reduce the efficiency of decision-making. This paper presents uEmergency, a multi-user collaborative system for emergency management on very large-scale interactive tabletop. It allows people to carry out face-to-face communication based on a horizontal global map. Real-time situation can be browsed and analyzed directly using their fingers and digital pens. In this paper, we also present the results of a study where two groups carried out a task for fighting forest fire based on this system. The results suggest that uEmergency can effectively help people manipulate objects, analyze situation and collaborate for coping with an emergency.

References

  1. Camp P. J, Hudson J. M, Keldorph R. B, Scot L, Mynatt E.D. Supporting communication and collaboration practices in safety-critical situations. In Proc. CHI 2000, ACM. 249--50. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Denef, S., Ramirez, L., Dyrks, T., Stevens, G. Handy Navigation in Ever-Changing Spaces' an Ethnographic Study of Firefighting Practices. In Proc. DIS 2008, ACM, 184--192. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Kristensen, M., Kyng, M., Palen, L. Participatory design in emergency medical service: designing for future practice. Proc. CHI 2006, ACM Press, 161--170. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Landgren, J., Nulden, Urban. A Study of Emergency Response Work: Patterns of Mobile Phone Interaction. Proc. CHI 2007, ACM. pp 1323--1332. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Li, J., Hara, K. O. Understanding Distributed Collaboration in Emergency Animal Disease Response. Proc. OZCHI 2009, ACM Press, pp 65--72. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Myers B, Malkin R, Bett M, Waibel A, Bostwick B, Miller RC. Flexi-modal and multi-machine user interfaces. In Proc ICMI'02. pp343--348. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Tang, A., Tory, M., Po, B., Neumann, P., Carpendale, S. T. Collaborative coupling over tabletop displays, In Proc. CHI'06, ACM. pp 1181--1190. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. uTableSDK. http://utablesdk.codeplex.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. uEmergency: a collaborative system for emergency management on very large tabletop

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      ITS '12: Proceedings of the 2012 ACM international conference on Interactive tabletops and surfaces
      November 2012
      430 pages
      ISBN:9781450312097
      DOI:10.1145/2396636

      Copyright © 2012 Copyright is held by the owner/author(s)

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 11 November 2012

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • poster

      Acceptance Rates

      ITS '12 Paper Acceptance Rate24of63submissions,38%Overall Acceptance Rate119of418submissions,28%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader