Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content

Engineering an Ontology of Financial Securities Fraud

  • Conference paper
On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2004: OTM 2004 Workshops (OTM 2004)

Abstract

This paper discusses the approach of ontology-based knowledge engineering in FF POIROT, a project to explore the use of ontology technology in information systems against financial fraud. A fraud forensic ontology is being developed from laws, regulations and cases about illegal solicitation of financial products on the web. The knowledge development is based on the DOGMA ontology paradigm, and the derived ontology engineering methodology AKEM. The regulatory ontology engineering is a multi-disciplinary and distributed team work through a series of tasks and deliverables with emphasis on the traceability of decision making in the development. The machine ontology extraction and a manually constructed bilingual terminological database, is used to support the ontology modelling process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aussenac-Gilles, N., Bielow, B., Szulman, S.: Corpus Analysis for Conceptual Modelling. In: Dieng, R., Corby, O. (eds.) EKAW 2000. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1937, p. 51. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Deray, T., Verheyden, P.: Towards a Semantic Integration of Medical Relational Databases by Using Ontologies: a Case Study. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z. (eds.) OTM-WS 2003. LNCS, vol. 2889, pp. 137–150. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Gruber, T.: Towards Principles A Translation Approach to Portable Ontology Specifications. Knowledge Acquisition 5(2), 199–220 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Grüingger, M., Fox, M.S.: Methodology for the design and evaluation of ontologies. In: IJCAI 1995 Workshop on basic ontological issues in knowledge sharing, Montreal (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jacobson, I., Booch, G., Rumbaugh, J.: The Unified Software Development Process. Addison-Wesley, Boston (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jarrar, M., Demey, J., Meersman, R.: On Reusing Conceptual Data Modeling for Ontology Engineering. Journal on Data Semantics 1(1), 185–207 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kerremans, K., Temmerman, R., Tummers, J.: Representing Multilingual and Culture- Specific Knowledge in a VAT Regulatory Ontology: Support from the Termontography Approach. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z. (eds.) OTM 2003 Workshops, Springer, Tübingen (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kingston, J., Vandenberghe, W.: A Comparison of A Regulatory Ontology with Existing Legal Ontology Frameworks. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z. (eds.) OTM 2003 Workshops, Springer, Tübingen (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kroll, P., Kruchten, P.: The Rational Unified Process Made Easy: A Practitioner’s Guide to the RUP. Addison-Wesley, Boston (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kruchten, P.: The Rational Unified Process: An Introduction. Addison Wesley, Boston (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Legislative Decree 58 of 24 February 1998, Consolidated Law on Financial Intermediation Pursuant to Articles of Law 52 of 6 February 1996, as Amended by Legislative Decree 61, April 11 (2002), http://www.consob.it/produzione/english/Regulations/fr_decree58.htm

  12. Meersman, R.: Reusing Certain Database Design Principles, Methods and Techniques for Ontology Theory, Construction and Methodology. STARLab Technical Report 01 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nobecourt, J.: A Method to Build Formal Ontologies from Texts, Corpus Analysis for Conceptual Modelling. In: EKAW 2000 Workshop on Ontologies and Texts. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, p. 51 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Temmerman, R.: Towards New Ways of Terminology Description - the Sociocognitive Approach. John Benjamins, Amsterdam (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wigmore, J.H.: The Science of Judicial Proof as given by Logic, Psychology and General Experience. Little Brown, Boston (1937)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zhao, G.: Application Semiotics Engineering Process. In: International Conference of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, pp. 354–359 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zhao, G., Gao, Y., Meersman, R.: An Ontology-based Approach to Business Modelling. In: Proceedings of the International Conference of Knowledge Engineering and Decision Support, pp. 213–221 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zhao, G. et al. (2004). Engineering an Ontology of Financial Securities Fraud. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z., Corsaro, A. (eds) On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2004: OTM 2004 Workshops. OTM 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3292. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30470-8_73

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30470-8_73

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-23664-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-30470-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics