A copy of this work was available on the public web and has been preserved in the Wayback Machine. The capture dates from 2022; you can also visit the original URL.
The file type is application/pdf.
Filters
Anti-dependency Arguments
[chapter]
2022
Dependency Theory After Fifty Years
Preserved Fulltext
The English author who initiated these objections in the 1970s claimed that capitalism tends to eliminate underdevelopment through the industrialization of the periphery, and that dependency theory failed ...
Some of them revised their earlier writings to highlight the expansion of the periphery under the helm of the transnational corporations (Cardoso, 2012: 31). ...
They imagined a growing process of maturation under the leadership of the civilized sectors of the working class. ...
doi:10.1163/9789004472693_009
fatcat:cevnfziabvahnbsq24xtly2mje
Analysing policy arguments
1996
European Journal of Development Research
Preserved Fulltext
A copy of this work was available on the public web and has been preserved in the Wayback Machine. The capture dates from 2017; you can also visit the original URL.
The file type is application/pdf.
The complexity and distinctiveness of policy discourse bring a need for methods and advice in both specifying and assessing policy arguments. ...
, including the 'logical framework approach' and Fischer's 'Logic of Policy Questions'. ...
In the classic liberal view of Locke, a man has exclusive right to the products of his own labour, including land that he opens up, provided that there be `enough and as good left in common for others' ...
doi:10.1080/09578819608426652
fatcat:icvtmiz2ozguveivzrehrhf7fa
Representing dialogic argumentation
2006
Knowledge-Based Systems
Preserved Fulltext
A copy of this work was available on the public web and has been preserved in the Wayback Machine. The capture dates from 2011; you can also visit the original URL.
The file type is application/pdf.
The commonalities between the approaches are explored in developing a means for representing dialogic argumentation in a common format. ...
Dialogic argumentation is a crucial component in many computational domains, and forms a core component of argumentation theory. ...
Empirical work could then assess the efficacy of different dialogue systems in different domains (Is Socratic dialogue good for mathematics teaching? ...
doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2005.08.002
fatcat:ehr7ddpmmfapdnvv4ymaer4n4m
Extending GQM by Argument Structures
[chapter]
2008
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Preserved Fulltext
A copy of this work was available on the public web and has been preserved in the Wayback Machine. The capture dates from 2017; you can also visit the original URL.
The file type is application/pdf.
The proposed approach is called Goal-Argument-Metric (GAM). The general ideas of GQM and GAM are briefly introduced and they are followed by the comparison of the two approaches. ...
Next, the Trust-IT framework is described -it is used to develop argument structures in GAM. Then a case study of application of GAM is presented. ...
The claim 'Good questionnaire results' is decomposed further giving assessment criteria for answers to particular questions (explaining what 'good' means in this context). ...
doi:10.1007/978-3-540-85279-7_3
fatcat:6zriddjbundqldwcptjlxzbmgm
Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory
2011
Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Preserved Fulltext
A copy of this work was available on the public web and has been preserved in the Wayback Machine. The capture dates from 2017; you can also visit the original URL.
The file type is application/pdf.
A wide range of evidence in the psychology of reasoning and decision making can be reinterpreted and better explained in the light of this hypothesis. ...
When the same problems are placed in a proper argumentative setting, people turn out to be skilled arguers. ...
What type of reasoning is required for it to construct these arguments, or does it run data back through S 1 for a reasoned result? ...
doi:10.1017/s0140525x10000968
pmid:21447233
fatcat:5bx7oge72ne53ctuqgws5rep7m
Natural Language Argumentation: Mining, Processing, and Reasoning over Textual Arguments (Dagstuhl Seminar 16161)
2016
Dagstuhl Reports
Preserved Fulltext
A copy of this work was available on the public web and has been preserved in the Wayback Machine. The capture dates from 2022; you can also visit the original URL.
The file type is application/pdf.
This report documents the program and the outcomes of Dagstuhl Seminar 16161 "Natural Language Argumentation: Mining, Processing, and Reasoning over Textual Arguments", 17-22 April 2016. ...
The seminar brought together leading researchers from computational linguistics, argumentation theory and cognitive psychology communities to discuss the obtained results and the future challenges of the ...
This work is supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council. ...
doi:10.4230/dagrep.6.4.80
dblp:journals/dagstuhl-reports/CabrioHVW16
fatcat:qycza5veojckzpnzpkdt5lrev4
Argument Maps Improve Critical Thinking
2004
Teaching Philosophy
Preserved Fulltext
A copy of this work was available on the public web and has been preserved in the Wayback Machine. The capture dates from 2011; you can also visit the original URL.
The file type is application/pdf.
Computer-based argument mapping greatly enhances student critical thinking, more than tripling absolute gains made by other methods. I describe the method and my experience as an outsider. ...
Argument mapping often showed precisely how students were erring (for example: confusing helping premises for separate reasons), making it much easier for them to fix their errors. ...
then must be able to assess evidence and support "in the wild" of informal arguments. ...
doi:10.5840/teachphil200427213
fatcat:77j2uuodsbdqnhrvzmjbbrnvn4
The Argument Web: an Online Ecosystem of Tools, Systems and Services for Argumentation
2017
Philosophy & Technology
Preserved Fulltext
A copy of this work was available on the public web and has been preserved in the Wayback Machine. The capture dates from 2019; you can also visit the original URL.
The file type is application/pdf.
The Argument Web is maturing as both a platform built upon a synthesis of many contemporary theories of argumentation in philosophy and also as an ecosystem in which various applications and application ...
The aim of this paper is to summarise the key foundations, the recent advances and the goals of the Argument Web, with a particular focus on demonstrating the relevance to, and roots in, philosophical ...
, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. ...
doi:10.1007/s13347-017-0260-8
pmid:32025475
pmcid:PMC6979725
fatcat:6hxwi5ys3vg65hukpna4oidrzi
Argumentation-based negotiation
2003
Knowledge engineering review (Print)
Preserved Fulltext
A copy of this work was available on the public web and has been preserved in the Wayback Machine. The capture dates from 2017; you can also visit the original URL.
The file type is application/pdf.
We then provide a conceptual framework through which we outline the core elements and features required by agents engaged in argumentation-based negotiation, as well as the environment that hosts these ...
However, a growing body of research is now emerging which points out limitations in such mechanisms and advocates the idea that agents can increase the likelihood and quality of an agreement by exchanging ...
This work commenced while IR was a visitor to the IAM Group of the School of Electronics and Computer Science at the University of Southampton, and the Agent ART Group of the Department of Computer Science ...
doi:10.1017/s0269888904000098
fatcat:vjudokmf2jdsjjpekecrv3odmi
Acceptance in incomplete argumentation frameworks
2021
Artificial Intelligence
Preserved Fulltext
A copy of this work was available on the public web and has been preserved in the Wayback Machine. The capture dates from 2022; you can also visit the original URL.
The file type is application/pdf.
They form a basis for the synthesization, assessment, and refinement of AI system validation in research and guidelines for validating individual systems in practice. ...
This, combined with the difficulty of testing AI systems with traditional methods, has made system trustworthiness a pressing issue. ...
The selection was made based on the relevance assessment of the papers, so that only papers of high enough relevance were included in the final set. ...
doi:10.1016/j.artint.2021.103470
fatcat:cmf2rikpaja5zdboq5zp6zr46y
The Social Nature of Argumentative Practices: The Philosophy of Argument and Audience Reception
2018
Informal Logic
Preserved Fulltext
A copy of this work was available on the public web and has been preserved in the Wayback Machine. The capture dates from 2019; you can also visit the original URL.
The file type is application/pdf.
Tindale's The Philosophyof Argument and Audience Reception(Cambridge, 2015).Résumé: Cet article est une critiquede The Philosophy of Argument andAudience Reception (Cambridge,2015) de Christopher W. ...
According to Feilke, argumentation in mature subjects tends to be more enthymematic, less explicit and require from the receptor a more active role (Feilke, 1996) . ...
By contrast, the assessment of the arguments' strength is something that pertains to the context of argumentative exchange and responds to a notion of validity that's operative in it; a notion of validity ...
doi:10.22329/il.v38i1.5071
fatcat:67s7umlgo5czxjzxnjtjlzonom
Introducing Bayesian Argumentation Networks
2016
IfColog journal of logics and their applications (FLAP)
Preserved Fulltext
A copy of this work was available on the public web and has been preserved in the Wayback Machine. The capture dates from 2022; you can also visit the original URL.
The file type is application/pdf.
They deal with the interaction of arguments through attacks and how acceptable conclusions can be drawn from conflicting sets of arguments. ...
While classical computational argumentation approaches (both abstract and structured) provide a qualitative form of defeasible reasoning, adding quantitative uncertainty (either in the form of probabilities ...
many recent approaches to practical reasoning through argumentation. ...
dblp:journals/flap/GabbayR16
fatcat:mraotyy7ufbd5atyj3bmsxfv4u
Moral argument and Christian ethics
1985
The Journal of contemporary health law and policy
Preserved Fulltext
A copy of this work was available on the public web and has been preserved in the Wayback Machine. The capture dates from 2020; you can also visit the original URL.
The file type is application/pdf.
of a good argument? ...
For many understandable historical reasons, Christianity spread and matured through many centuries in societies composed of the educated and uneducated. ...
pmid:11645592
fatcat:bck6iw3lrneetnlvmpsozmf5mu
Computer-assisted argument mapping: a rationale approach
2009
Higher Education
Preserved Fulltext
A copy of this work was available on the public web and has been preserved in the Wayback Machine. The capture dates from 2017; you can also visit the original URL.
The file type is application/pdf.
Computer-Assisted Argument Mapping (CAAM) is a new way of understanding arguments. ...
CAAM claims to be helpful in an educational context, as a tool for students in responding to assessment tasks. However, to date there is little evidence from students that this is the case. ...
The coordinator of the subject required all students completing the subject to complete an argument map for assessment (10% of the semester mark). ...
doi:10.1007/s10734-009-9226-9
fatcat:wxbpiq4buvfobcvggvkswy56be
Reasonable Reasons in Contractualist Moral Argument
2003
Ethics: An International Journal of Social, Political, and Legal Philosophy
Preserved Fulltext
A copy of this work was available on the public web and has been preserved in the Wayback Machine. The capture dates from 2017; you can also visit the original URL.
The file type is application/pdf.
what is meant is that they play an initial role in moral argument as general classes of relevant consideration, through which specific details of the situation to be assessed can be filtered. ...
A principle may turn out to be potentially very burdensome for those assessing it from a particular point of view; that will not be enough, though, to justify the reasonable rejection of the proposed principle ...
doi:10.1086/378034
fatcat:vwbnnlroubhghpwwefjsiyqjhy
« Previous
Showing results 1 — 15 out of 104,859 results