Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Allais’ paradox and resource allocation in telecommunication networks

  • Published:
Telecommunication Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The question of resource allocation arises whenever demand exceeds supply. The common approach is to optimize the network efficiency while maintaining some fairness among the users. While resource allocation policies use various definitions for network efficiency and fairness, most of them are based on maximization of a utility function. The mathematical formalism underlying these approaches is the same as the mathematical formalism used in the Bernoulli model in finance, where a player is supposed to maximize his expected utility function. This model is disproved by Allais’ paradox, which provides examples of rational behaviors which cannot be described by the maximization of any utility function. By transposing this paradox to telecommunication networks for the purpose of resource allocation, we build examples of rational operators whose optimal choice cannot be described by the maximization of any utility function. By optimizing a trade-off between network efficiency and fairness, we propose a model similar to the risk-return trade-off optimization in finance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. French francs were originally used in all the paradoxes

References

  1. Allais, M. (1979). The so-called Allais paradox and rational decisions under uncertainty. In M. Allais & O. Hagen (Eds.), Expected utility hypotheses and the Allais paradox (pp. 437–681). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Bertsimas, D., Farias, V. F., & Trichakis, N. (2012). On the efficiency-fairness trade-off. Management Science, 58(12), 2234–2250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bodie, Z., Kane, A., & Marcus, A. J. (2011). Investment and portfolio management. Irwin: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Combes, R., Altman, Z., & Altman, E. (2010). On the use of packet scheduling in self-optimization processes: application to coverage-capacity optimization. In Proceedings of the 8th international symposium on modeling and optimization in mobile, ad hoc and wireless networks (WiOpt) (pp. 98–107). IEEE.

  5. Feng, D., Jiang, C., Lim, G., Cimini, L. J., Feng, G., & Li, G. Y. (2013). A survey of energy-efficient wireless communications. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, 15(1), 167–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fossati, F., Moretti, S., & Secci, S. (2017). A mood value for fair resource allocations. arXiv preprint arXiv:1701.07991.

  7. Hong, M., & Garcia, A. (2012). Mechanism design for base station association and resource allocation in downlink OFDMA network. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 30(11), 2238–2250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Huaizhou, S., Prasad, R. V., Onur, E., & Niemegeers, I. (2014). Fairness in wireless networks: Issues, measures and challenges. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, 16(1), 5–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Joe-Wong, C., Sen, S., Lan, T., & Chiang, M. (2013). Multiresource allocation: Fairness-efficiency tradeoffs in a unifying framework. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking (TON), 21(6), 1785–1798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kang, X., Zhang, R., & Motani, M. (2012). Price-based resource allocation for spectrum-sharing femtocell networks: A stackelberg game approach. IEEE Journal on Selected areas in Communications, 30(3), 538–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kelly, F. (1997). Charging and rate control for elastic traffic. European Transactions on Telecommunications, 8(1), 33–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Koutsopoulos, I., & Tassiulas, L. (2002). Adaptive resource allocation in SDMA-based wireless broadband networks with OFDM signaling. In Proceedings of the twenty-first annual joint conference of the IEEE computer and communications societies, INFOCOM 2002 (vol. 3, pp. 1376–1385). IEEE.

  13. Lan, T., Kao, D., Chiang, M., & Sabharwal, A. (2010). An axiomatic theory of fairness in network resource allocation. IEEE: Piscataway.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Le, L., & Hossain, E. (2007). Multihop cellular networks: Potential gains, research challenges, and a resource allocation framework. IEEE Communications Magazine, 45(9), 66–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee, J. W., Mazumdar, R. R., & Shroff, N. B. (2006). Joint resource allocation and base-station assignment for the downlink in CDMA networks. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 14(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Li, C., Song, S., Zhang, J., & Letaief, K.B. (2012). Maximizing energy efficiency in wireless networks with a minimum average throughput requirement. In 2012 IEEE wireless communications and networking conference (WCNC) (pp. 1130–1134). IEEE.

  17. Lin, Y., Bao, W., Yu, W., & Liang, B. (2015). Optimizing user association and spectrum allocation in HetNets: A utility perspective. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 33(6), 1025–1039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Maric, I., Bostjancic, B., & Goldsmith, A. (2011) Resource allocation for constrained backhaul in picocell networks. In Information Theory and Applications Workshop (ITA) (pp. 1–6). IEEE

  19. Markowitz, H. (1952). Portfolio selection. The Journal of Finance, 7(1), 77–91.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Massoulié, L., & Roberts, J.(1999) Bandwidth sharing: Objectives and algorithms. In Proceedings of the eighteenth annual joint conference of the IEEE computer and communications societies, INFOCOM’99IEEE (vol. 3, pp. 1395–1403). IEEE.

  21. Mo, J., & Walrand, J. (2000). Fair end-to-end window-based congestion control. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking (ToN), 8(5), 556–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ng, D. W. K., Lo, E. S., & Schober, R. (2013). Energy-efficient resource allocation in OFDMA systems with hybrid energy harvesting base station. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 12(7), 3412–3427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ogryczak, W., Luss, H., Pióro, M., Nace, D., & Tomaszewski, A. (2014). Fair optimization and networks: A survey. Journal of Applied Mathematics, 2014, 612018.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Pujol, F. (2011). Mobile traffic forecasts 2010–2020 and offloading solutions. IDATE Consulting and Research. 15 May.

  25. Rodrigues, E. B., & Casadevall, F. (2011). Control of the trade-off between resource efficiency and user fairness in wireless networks using utility-based adaptive resource allocation. IEEE Communications Magazine, 49(9), 15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Seong, K., Mohseni, M., & Cioffi, J. M. (2006). Optimal resource allocation for OFDMA downlink systems. In 2006 IEEE international symposium on information theory (pp. 1394–1398). IEEE.

  27. Shannon, C. E. (2001). A mathematical theory of communication. ACM SIGMOBILE Mobile Computing and Communications Review, 5(1), 3–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (2007). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ye, Q., Rong, B., Chen, Y., Al-Shalash, M., Caramanis, C., & Andrews, J. G. (2013). User association for load balancing in heterogeneous cellular networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 12(6), 2706–2716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Yetgin, H., Cheung, K. T. K., El-Hajjar, M., & Hanzo, L. H. (2017). A survey of network lifetime maximization techniques in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, 19(2), 828–854.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Jerusalem College of Technology, Jerusalem, Israel

    Philippe Ezran & Yoram Haddad

  2. CentraleSupélec, Metz, France

    Philippe Ezran & Mérouane Debbah

Authors
  1. Philippe Ezran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yoram Haddad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mérouane Debbah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philippe Ezran.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ezran, P., Haddad, Y. & Debbah, M. Allais’ paradox and resource allocation in telecommunication networks. Telecommun Syst 70, 337–348 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-018-0484-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-018-0484-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation